From: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Chenbo Feng <fengc@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
Charan Teja Reddy <charante@codeaurora.org>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
syzbot+3643a18836bce555bff6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: [PATCH] dma-buf: Move dma_buf_release() from fops to dentry_ops
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 14:03:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200610083333.455-1-sumit.semwal@linaro.org> (raw)
Charan Teja reported a 'use-after-free' in dmabuffs_dname [1], which
happens if the dma_buf_release() is called while the userspace is
accessing the dma_buf pseudo fs's dmabuffs_dname() in another process,
and dma_buf_release() releases the dmabuf object when the last reference
to the struct file goes away.
I discussed with Arnd Bergmann, and he suggested that rather than tying
the dma_buf_release() to the file_operations' release(), we can tie it to
the dentry_operations' d_release(), which will be called when the last ref
to the dentry is removed.
The path exercised by __fput() calls f_op->release() first, and then calls
dput, which eventually calls d_op->d_release().
In the 'normal' case, when no userspace access is happening via dma_buf
pseudo fs, there should be exactly one fd, file, dentry and inode, so
closing the fd will kill of everything right away.
In the presented case, the dentry's d_release() will be called only when
the dentry's last ref is released.
Therefore, lets move dma_buf_release() from fops->release() to
d_ops->d_release().
Many thanks to Arnd for his FS insights :)
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1238278/
Fixes: bb2bb9030425 ("dma-buf: add DMA_BUF_SET_NAME ioctls")
Reported-by: syzbot+3643a18836bce555bff6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [5.3+]
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reported-by: Charan Teja Reddy <charante@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
---
drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 13 +++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
index 01ce125f8e8d..92ba4b6ef3e7 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
@@ -54,8 +54,11 @@ static char *dmabuffs_dname(struct dentry *dentry, char *buffer, int buflen)
dentry->d_name.name, ret > 0 ? name : "");
}
+static void dma_buf_release(struct dentry *dentry);
+
static const struct dentry_operations dma_buf_dentry_ops = {
.d_dname = dmabuffs_dname,
+ .d_release = dma_buf_release,
};
static struct vfsmount *dma_buf_mnt;
@@ -77,14 +80,14 @@ static struct file_system_type dma_buf_fs_type = {
.kill_sb = kill_anon_super,
};
-static int dma_buf_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+static void dma_buf_release(struct dentry *dentry)
{
struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
- if (!is_dma_buf_file(file))
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (dentry->d_op != &dma_buf_dentry_ops)
+ return;
- dmabuf = file->private_data;
+ dmabuf = dentry->d_fsdata;
BUG_ON(dmabuf->vmapping_counter);
@@ -110,7 +113,6 @@ static int dma_buf_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
module_put(dmabuf->owner);
kfree(dmabuf->name);
kfree(dmabuf);
- return 0;
}
static int dma_buf_mmap_internal(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
@@ -412,7 +414,6 @@ static void dma_buf_show_fdinfo(struct seq_file *m, struct file *file)
}
static const struct file_operations dma_buf_fops = {
- .release = dma_buf_release,
.mmap = dma_buf_mmap_internal,
.llseek = dma_buf_llseek,
.poll = dma_buf_poll,
--
2.27.0
next reply other threads:[~2020-06-10 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-10 8:33 Sumit Semwal [this message]
2020-06-10 9:26 ` [PATCH] dma-buf: Move dma_buf_release() from fops to dentry_ops Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-10 15:14 ` Sumit Semwal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200610083333.455-1-sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--to=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=charante@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=fengc@google.com \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+3643a18836bce555bff6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox