From: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
ak@linux.intel.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v12 11/11] KVM: vmx/pmu: Release guest LBR event via lazy release mechanism
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 16:09:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200613080958.132489-12-like.xu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200613080958.132489-1-like.xu@linux.intel.com>
The vPMU uses GUEST_LBR_IN_USE_IDX (bit 58) in 'pmu->pmc_in_use' to
indicate whether a guest LBR event is still needed by the vcpu. If the
vcpu no longer accesses LBR related registers within a scheduling time
slice, and the enable bit of LBR has been unset, vPMU will treat the
guest LBR event as a bland event of a vPMC counter and release it
as usual. Also the pass-through state of LBR records msrs is cancelled.
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c | 7 +++++++
arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h | 4 ++++
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 4 ++++
4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
index 5053f4238218..e5b76f1c3ce8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
@@ -458,6 +458,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_cleanup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
struct kvm_pmc *pmc = NULL;
DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmask, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX);
int i;
+ bool arch_cleanup = false;
pmu->need_cleanup = false;
@@ -469,8 +470,14 @@ void kvm_pmu_cleanup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (pmc && pmc->perf_event && !pmc_speculative_in_use(pmc))
pmc_stop_counter(pmc);
+
+ if (i == INTEL_GUEST_LBR_INUSE)
+ arch_cleanup = true;
}
+ if (arch_cleanup && kvm_x86_ops.pmu_ops->cleanup)
+ kvm_x86_ops.pmu_ops->cleanup(vcpu);
+
bitmap_zero(pmu->pmc_in_use, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX);
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
index 095b84392b89..d5023eacd8ed 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
@@ -15,6 +15,9 @@
#define VMWARE_BACKDOOR_PMC_REAL_TIME 0x10001
#define VMWARE_BACKDOOR_PMC_APPARENT_TIME 0x10002
+/* Indicates whether Intel LBR msrs were accessed during the last time slice. */
+#define INTEL_GUEST_LBR_INUSE INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED_VLBR
+
struct kvm_event_hw_type_mapping {
u8 eventsel;
u8 unit_mask;
@@ -38,6 +41,7 @@ struct kvm_pmu_ops {
void (*init)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void (*reset)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void (*deliver_pmi)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+ void (*cleanup)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
};
static inline u64 pmc_bitmask(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
index 75ba0444b4d1..c1c5058acc90 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
@@ -303,6 +303,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_free_lbr_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static bool access_lbr_record_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct msr_data *msr_info, bool read)
{
+ struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
struct lbr_desc *lbr_desc = &to_vmx(vcpu)->lbr_desc;
u32 index = msr_info->index;
@@ -331,6 +332,7 @@ static bool access_lbr_record_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
msr_info->data = 0;
local_irq_enable();
+ __set_bit(INTEL_GUEST_LBR_INUSE, pmu->pmc_in_use);
return true;
dummy:
@@ -483,6 +485,7 @@ static int intel_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL, data);
if (!msr_info->host_initiated && !to_vmx(vcpu)->lbr_desc.event)
intel_pmu_create_lbr_event(vcpu);
+ __set_bit(INTEL_GUEST_LBR_INUSE, pmu->pmc_in_use);
return 0;
default:
if ((pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0)) ||
@@ -584,7 +587,9 @@ static void intel_pmu_refresh(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC, pmu->nr_arch_fixed_counters);
if ((vcpu->arch.perf_capabilities & PMU_CAP_LBR_FMT) &&
- x86_perf_get_lbr(&lbr_desc->lbr))
+ !x86_perf_get_lbr(&lbr_desc->lbr))
+ bitmap_set(pmu->all_valid_pmc_idx, INTEL_GUEST_LBR_INUSE, 1);
+ else
vcpu->arch.perf_capabilities &= ~PMU_CAP_LBR_FMT;
nested_vmx_pmu_entry_exit_ctls_update(vcpu);
@@ -672,6 +677,12 @@ static void intel_pmu_deliver_pmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
intel_pmu_legacy_freezing_lbrs_on_pmi(vcpu);
}
+static void intel_pmu_cleanup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ if (!(vmcs_read64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL) & DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR))
+ intel_pmu_free_lbr_event(vcpu);
+}
+
struct kvm_pmu_ops intel_pmu_ops = {
.find_arch_event = intel_find_arch_event,
.find_fixed_event = intel_find_fixed_event,
@@ -687,4 +698,5 @@ struct kvm_pmu_ops intel_pmu_ops = {
.init = intel_pmu_init,
.reset = intel_pmu_reset,
.deliver_pmi = intel_pmu_deliver_pmi,
+ .cleanup = intel_pmu_cleanup,
};
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 800a26e3b571..8521fc640b95 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -3912,17 +3912,21 @@ static inline void vmx_lbr_enable_passthrough(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
*/
static void vmx_passthrough_lbr_msrs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
+ struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
struct lbr_desc *lbr_desc = &to_vmx(vcpu)->lbr_desc;
if (!lbr_desc->event) {
vmx_lbr_disable_passthrough(vcpu);
if (vmcs_read64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL) & DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR)
goto warn;
+ if (test_bit(INTEL_GUEST_LBR_INUSE, pmu->pmc_in_use))
+ goto warn;
return;
}
if (lbr_desc->event->state < PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE) {
vmx_lbr_disable_passthrough(vcpu);
+ __clear_bit(INTEL_GUEST_LBR_INUSE, pmu->pmc_in_use);
goto warn;
} else
vmx_lbr_enable_passthrough(vcpu);
--
2.21.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-13 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-13 8:09 [PATCH v12 00/11] Guest Last Branch Recording Enabling Like Xu
2020-06-13 8:09 ` [PATCH v12 01/11] perf/x86: Fix variable types for LBR registers Like Xu
2020-07-03 8:01 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Wei Wang
2020-11-09 6:34 ` [PATCH v12 01/11] " Andi Kleen
2020-11-11 2:14 ` Xu, Like
2020-06-13 8:09 ` [PATCH v12 02/11] perf/x86/core: Refactor hw->idx checks and cleanup Like Xu
2020-07-03 8:01 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Like Xu
2020-06-13 8:09 ` [PATCH v12 03/11] perf/x86/lbr: Add interface to get LBR information Like Xu
2020-07-03 8:01 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Like Xu
2020-06-13 8:09 ` [PATCH v12 04/11] perf/x86: Add constraint to create guest LBR event without hw counter Like Xu
2020-06-13 8:09 ` [PATCH v12 05/11] perf/x86: Keep LBR records unchanged in host context for guest usage Like Xu
2020-06-13 8:09 ` [PATCH v12 06/11] KVM: vmx/pmu: Expose LBR to guest via MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES Like Xu
2020-07-08 13:36 ` Andi Kleen
2020-07-08 14:38 ` Xu, Like
2020-06-13 8:09 ` [PATCH v12 07/11] KVM: vmx/pmu: Unmask LBR fields in the MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR emualtion Like Xu
2020-06-13 9:14 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-06-13 9:42 ` Xu, Like
2020-07-07 20:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-07-08 1:37 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-07-08 7:06 ` Xu, Like
2020-07-10 16:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-06-13 8:09 ` [PATCH v12 08/11] KVM: vmx/pmu: Pass-through LBR msrs when guest LBR event is scheduled Like Xu
2020-06-13 8:09 ` [PATCH v12 09/11] KVM: vmx/pmu: Emulate legacy freezing LBRs on virtual PMI Like Xu
2020-06-13 8:09 ` [PATCH v12 10/11] KVM: vmx/pmu: Reduce the overhead of LBR pass-through or cancellation Like Xu
2020-06-13 8:09 ` Like Xu [this message]
2020-06-13 8:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] target/i386: define a new MSR based feature word - FEAT_PERF_CAPABILITIES Like Xu
2020-06-13 8:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] target/i386: add -cpu,lbr=true support to enable guest LBR Like Xu
2020-06-23 13:13 ` [PATCH v12 00/11] Guest Last Branch Recording Enabling Like Xu
2020-07-01 2:38 ` Like Xu
2020-07-02 7:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-02 13:11 ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-02 13:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-03 7:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-03 8:04 ` Xu, Like
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200613080958.132489-12-like.xu@linux.intel.com \
--to=like.xu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox