From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
To: Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [sched/fair] 070f5e860e: reaim.jobs_per_min -10.5% regression
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 10:10:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200615081041.GA16990@vingu-book> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <90f4036d-bb16-af67-8776-a2cbe67dfe7f@linux.intel.com>
Hi Xing,
Le lundi 15 juin 2020 à 15:26:59 (+0800), Xing Zhengjun a écrit :
>
>
> On 6/12/2020 7:06 PM, Hillf Danton wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 14:36:49 +0800 Xing Zhengjun wrote:
...
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -8215,12 +8215,8 @@ group_has_capacity(unsigned int imbalanc
> > if (sgs->sum_nr_running < sgs->group_weight)
> > return true;
> > - if ((sgs->group_capacity * imbalance_pct) <
> > - (sgs->group_runnable * 100))
> > - return false;
> > -
> > - if ((sgs->group_capacity * 100) >
> > - (sgs->group_util * imbalance_pct))
> > + if ((sgs->group_capacity * 100) > (sgs->group_util * imbalance_pct) &&
> > + (sgs->group_capacity * 100) > (sgs->group_runnable * imbalance_pct))
> > return true;
> > return false;
> > @@ -8240,12 +8236,8 @@ group_is_overloaded(unsigned int imbalan
> > if (sgs->sum_nr_running <= sgs->group_weight)
> > return false;
> > - if ((sgs->group_capacity * 100) <
> > - (sgs->group_util * imbalance_pct))
> > - return true;
> > -
> > - if ((sgs->group_capacity * imbalance_pct) <
> > - (sgs->group_runnable * 100))
> > + if ((sgs->group_capacity * 100) < (sgs->group_util * imbalance_pct) ||
> > + (sgs->group_capacity * 100) < (sgs->group_runnable * imbalance_pct))
> > return true;
> > return false;
> >
>
> I apply the patch based on v5.7, the regression still existed.
Thanks for the test. I don't know if it's relevant or not but the results seem a bit
better with the patch and I'd like to check that it's only a matter of threshold to
fix the problem.
Could you try the patch below which is quite aggressive but will help to confirm this ?
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 28be1c984a42..3c51d557547b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -8322,10 +8322,13 @@ static inline int sg_imbalanced(struct sched_group *group)
static inline bool
group_has_capacity(unsigned int imbalance_pct, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs)
{
+ unsigned long imb;
+
if (sgs->sum_nr_running < sgs->group_weight)
return true;
- if ((sgs->group_capacity * imbalance_pct) <
+ imb = sgs->sum_nr_running * 100;
+ if ((sgs->group_capacity * imb) <
(sgs->group_runnable * 100))
return false;
@@ -8347,6 +8350,8 @@ group_has_capacity(unsigned int imbalance_pct, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs)
static inline bool
group_is_overloaded(unsigned int imbalance_pct, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs)
{
+ unsigned long imb;
+
if (sgs->sum_nr_running <= sgs->group_weight)
return false;
@@ -8354,7 +8359,8 @@ group_is_overloaded(unsigned int imbalance_pct, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs)
(sgs->group_util * imbalance_pct))
return true;
- if ((sgs->group_capacity * imbalance_pct) <
+ imb = sgs->sum_nr_running * 100;
+ if ((sgs->group_capacity * imb) <
(sgs->group_runnable * 100))
return true;
>
> =========================================================================================
> tbox_group/testcase/rootfs/kconfig/compiler/runtime/nr_task/debug-setup/test/cpufreq_governor/ucode:
>
> lkp-ivb-d04/reaim/debian-x86_64-20191114.cgz/x86_64-rhel-7.6/gcc-7/300s/100%/test/five_sec/performance/0x21
>
> commit:
> 9f68395333ad7f5bfe2f83473fed363d4229f11c
> 070f5e860ee2bf588c99ef7b4c202451faa48236
> v5.7
> 6b33257768b8dd3982054885ea310871be2cfe0b (Hillf's patch)
>
> 9f68395333ad7f5b 070f5e860ee2bf588c99ef7b4c2 v5.7
> 6b33257768b8dd3982054885ea3
> ---------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------
> ---------------------------
> %stddev %change %stddev %change %stddev %change
> %stddev
> \ | \ | \
> | \
> 0.69 -10.3% 0.62 -9.1% 0.62
> -10.1% 0.62 reaim.child_systime
> 0.62 -1.0% 0.61 +0.5% 0.62
> +0.3% 0.62 reaim.child_utime
> 66870 -10.0% 60187 -7.6% 61787
> -8.3% 61305 reaim.jobs_per_min
> 16717 -10.0% 15046 -7.6% 15446
> -8.3% 15326 reaim.jobs_per_min_child
> 97.84 -1.1% 96.75 -0.4% 97.43
> -0.5% 97.37 reaim.jti
> 72000 -10.8% 64216 -8.3% 66000
> -8.3% 66000 reaim.max_jobs_per_min
> 0.36 +10.6% 0.40 +7.8% 0.39
> +9.4% 0.39 reaim.parent_time
> 1.58 ± 2% +71.0% 2.70 ± 2% +26.9% 2.01 ± 2%
> +33.2% 2.11 reaim.std_dev_percent
> 0.00 ± 5% +110.4% 0.01 ± 3% +48.8% 0.01 ± 7%
> +65.3% 0.01 ± 3% reaim.std_dev_time
> 50800 -2.4% 49600 -1.6% 50000
> -1.8% 49866 reaim.workload
>
>
>
> --
> Zhengjun Xing
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-15 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-19 2:38 [sched/fair] 070f5e860e: reaim.jobs_per_min -10.5% regression kernel test robot
2020-06-12 6:36 ` [LKP] " Xing Zhengjun
2020-06-12 7:07 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-06-12 15:19 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-06-15 7:37 ` Xing Zhengjun
[not found] ` <20200612110616.20264-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2020-06-12 15:23 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-06-15 7:26 ` Xing Zhengjun
2020-06-15 8:10 ` Vincent Guittot [this message]
2020-06-16 3:17 ` Xing Zhengjun
2020-06-16 6:54 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-06-17 0:30 ` Xing Zhengjun
2020-06-17 14:57 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-06-17 16:25 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-06-18 2:45 ` Xing Zhengjun
2020-06-18 12:35 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-06-19 5:01 ` Xing Zhengjun
[not found] ` <20200618082406.8292-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2020-06-19 5:10 ` Xing Zhengjun
2020-06-19 4:55 ` Xing Zhengjun
2020-06-19 7:15 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-06-24 9:04 ` Vincent Guittot
[not found] ` <20200615151030.6480-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2020-06-16 3:24 ` Xing Zhengjun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200615081041.GA16990@vingu-book \
--to=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox