From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v3 1/2] kcov: Make runtime functions noinstr-compatible
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 16:53:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200615145336.GA220132@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200615142949.GT2531@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 09:53:06AM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> >
> > Disabling KCOV for smp_processor_id now moves the crash elsewhere. In
> > the case of KASAN into its 'memcpy' wrapper, called after
> > __this_cpu_read in fixup_bad_iret. This is making me suspicious,
> > because it shouldn't be called from the noinstr functions.
>
> With your .config, objtool complains about exactly that though:
>
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: fixup_bad_iret()+0x8e: call to memcpy() leaves .noinstr.text section
>
> The utterly gruesome thing below 'cures' that.
Is __memcpy() generally available? I think that bypasses KASAN and
whatever else.
> > For KCSAN the crash still happens in check_preemption_disabled, in the
> > inlined native_save_fl function (apparently on its 'pushf'). If I turn
> > fixup_bad_iret's __this_cpu_read into a raw_cpu_read (to bypass
> > check_preemption_disabled), no more crash with KCSAN.
>
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: debug_smp_processor_id()+0x0: call to __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc() leaves .noinstr.text section
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: check_preemption_disabled()+0x1f: call to __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc() leaves .noinstr.text section
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __this_cpu_preempt_check()+0x4: call to __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc() leaves .noinstr.text section
>
> That could be either of those I suppose, did you have the NOP patches
> on? Let me try... those seem to placate objtool at least.
>
> I do see a fair amount of __kasan_check*() crud though:
>
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: rcu_nmi_exit()+0x44: call to __kasan_check_read() leaves .noinstr.text section
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: rcu_dynticks_eqs_enter()+0x1c: call to __kasan_check_write() leaves .noinstr.text section
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: rcu_nmi_enter()+0x46: call to __kasan_check_read() leaves .noinstr.text section
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: rcu_dynticks_eqs_exit()+0x21: call to __kasan_check_write() leaves .noinstr.text section
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __rcu_is_watching()+0x1c: call to __kasan_check_read() leaves .noinstr.text section
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: debug_locks_off()+0x1b: call to __kasan_check_write() leaves .noinstr.text section
>
> That wasn't supported to happen with the __no_sanitize patches on (which
> I didn't forget). Aah, I think we've lost a bunch of patches.. /me goes
> rummage.
>
> This:
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200603114051.896465666@infradead.org
>
> that cures the rcu part of that.
>
> Let me go look at your KCSAN thing now...
I tried to find the stack that is used by the crashing code -- which led
me to entry_stack? So I tried this:
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ struct x86_hw_tss {
#define IO_BITMAP_OFFSET_INVALID (__KERNEL_TSS_LIMIT + 1)
struct entry_stack {
- unsigned long words[64];
+ unsigned long words[128];
};
struct entry_stack_page {
No more crash. But that's probably not what we want. Just a datapoint.
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> index af75109485c26..031a21fb5a741 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -675,6 +675,14 @@ struct bad_iret_stack {
> struct pt_regs regs;
> };
>
> +void __always_inline __badcpy(void *dst, void *src, int nr)
> +{
> + unsigned long *d = dst, *s = src;
> + nr /= sizeof(unsigned long);
> + while (nr--)
> + *(d++) = *(s++);
> +}
> +
If we can use __memcpy() here, that would probably solve that.
Thanks,
-- Marco
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-15 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-05 8:28 [PATCH -tip v3 1/2] kcov: Make runtime functions noinstr-compatible Marco Elver
2020-06-05 8:28 ` [PATCH -tip v3 2/2] kcov: Unconditionally add -fno-stack-protector to compiler options Marco Elver
2020-06-05 16:50 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-05 10:57 ` [PATCH -tip v3 1/2] kcov: Make runtime functions noinstr-compatible Dmitry Vyukov
2020-06-05 12:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-05 13:25 ` Andrey Konovalov
2020-06-07 9:37 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-06-08 7:48 ` Marco Elver
2020-06-08 7:57 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-06-08 11:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-11 21:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-11 21:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-12 11:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-12 4:04 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-06-12 11:49 ` Marco Elver
2020-06-13 17:24 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-06-15 7:53 ` Marco Elver
2020-06-15 14:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-15 14:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-15 14:53 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2020-06-15 15:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-15 15:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-17 14:32 ` Marco Elver
2020-06-17 14:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-17 15:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-17 15:19 ` Marco Elver
2020-06-17 15:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-17 16:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-17 18:06 ` Marco Elver
2020-06-15 14:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200615145336.GA220132@google.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox