From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@opensource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mfd: mfd-core: Add mechanism for removal of a subset of children
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:22:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200616132259.GS2608702@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200616100625.GT71940@ediswmail.ad.cirrus.com>
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:15:45AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Jun 2020, Charles Keepax wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 08:58:34AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 15 Jun 2020, Charles Keepax wrote:
> > > Does this match how you would expect this to be used?
> >
> > No, not at all.
> >
> > > I do have some concerns. The code can't use mfd_get_cell since it
> > > returns a const pointer, although the pointer in platform_device
> > > isn't const so we access that directly, could update mfd_get_cell? We
> > > also don't have access to mfd_dev_type outside of the mfd core so
> > > its hard to check we are actually setting the mfd_cell of actual
> > > MFD children, I guess just checking for mfd_cell being not NULL is
> > > good enough?
> >
> > Hmmm... looks like I missed the fact that you needed additional
> > processing between the removal of each batch of devices. My
> > implementation simply handles the order in which devices are removed
> > (a bit like initcall()s).
> >
> > How about the inclusion of mfd_remove_devices_late(), whereby
> > mfd_remove_devices() will refuse to remove devices tagged with
> > MFD_DEP_LEVEL_HIGH.
> >
>
> Yeah this should work fine for my use-case.
>
> > Not sure why, but I really dislike the idea of device removal by
> > arbitrary value/tag, as I see it spawning all sorts of weird and
> > wonderful implications/hacks/abuse.
> >
>
> Its definitely a spectrum with flexibility covering more
> use-cases but also definitely opening things up to more abuse. If
> you are more comfortable with this approach that is fine with me.
>
> Would you like me to have a crack at coding it up this way? Or
> did you want to do a patch?
Either/or. I don't want to steal your thunder, but I'm happy to draft
if you are.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-16 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-15 15:07 [PATCH v2 1/2] mfd: mfd-core: Add mechanism for removal of a subset of children Charles Keepax
2020-06-15 15:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mfd: madera: Improve handling of regulator unbinding Charles Keepax
2020-06-16 7:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mfd: mfd-core: Add mechanism for removal of a subset of children Lee Jones
2020-06-16 8:47 ` Charles Keepax
2020-06-16 9:15 ` Lee Jones
2020-06-16 10:06 ` Charles Keepax
2020-06-16 13:22 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2020-06-16 13:30 ` Charles Keepax
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200616132259.GS2608702@dell \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox