From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 760EAC433E0 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:41:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB3A20C56 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:41:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1592322110; bh=ruNSsfJCTPonu4mLKTusIRA8aOSqZO700jsa+VZrv2U=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=WvDc5vkUIhb1lYXDMC2vheeGXU2aYyLmmj2u3wI6I06NqDjpZAt55DAZzHA8rdvSz qFcWArWRQa9yEuxEXUvU5vfKlj7a6x2A4srdwIuM/VCXrdc8ozbXCJ1U1n4rEsAAP6 +2AMD3+yLv5NH9SuVnVrJjv4LzRAw1rjD1Bzdei0= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731531AbgFPPlt (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2020 11:41:49 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:57680 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730729AbgFPPln (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2020 11:41:43 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB85521531; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:41:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1592322103; bh=ruNSsfJCTPonu4mLKTusIRA8aOSqZO700jsa+VZrv2U=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=qOgKUBKyx/WDAJCWFBly40E8pNjOjwmDpYLgF2mYxBD6t0jMa8/B3/RXeFsajDyAi bmC3L1OTSQh0Qk7fWAKPQCUBeLDRdQPzX742GyJcpwG0so6EYvqgfSZe4bGctNtUGf FFnkROh10ayfN1s9w17KzpMReD4kX4HDiV1Jnhuc= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke , Dick Kennedy , James Smart , "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: [PATCH 5.4 111/134] scsi: lpfc: Fix negation of else clause in lpfc_prep_node_fc4type Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 17:34:55 +0200 Message-Id: <20200616153106.103157170@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20200616153100.633279950@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20200616153100.633279950@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Dick Kennedy commit f809da6db68a8be49e317f0ccfbced1af9258839 upstream. Implementation of a previous patch added a condition to an if check that always end up with the if test being true. Execution of the else clause was inadvertently negated. The additional condition check was incorrect and unnecessary after the other modifications had been done in that patch. Remove the check from the if series. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200501214310.91713-5-jsmart2021@gmail.com Fixes: b95b21193c85 ("scsi: lpfc: Fix loss of remote port after devloss due to lack of RPIs") Cc: # v5.4+ Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke Signed-off-by: Dick Kennedy Signed-off-by: James Smart Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_ct.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_ct.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_ct.c @@ -462,7 +462,6 @@ lpfc_prep_node_fc4type(struct lpfc_vport struct lpfc_nodelist *ndlp; if ((vport->port_type != LPFC_NPIV_PORT) || - (fc4_type == FC_TYPE_FCP) || !(vport->ct_flags & FC_CT_RFF_ID) || !vport->cfg_restrict_login) { ndlp = lpfc_setup_disc_node(vport, Did);