From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888ABC433E0 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 20:37:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E4652085B for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 20:37:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="JrJuCY8i" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729566AbgFPUhx (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2020 16:37:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35232 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725896AbgFPUhw (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2020 16:37:52 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 602D1C061573 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 13:37:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f0f4c005d574143de1de924.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0f:4c00:5d57:4143:de1d:e924]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 1FE4E1EC0298; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 22:37:50 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1592339870; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=4zT/WRletl+Xsh+/UZge/BuZpW+JSMfQvx7YHZ4aIH8=; b=JrJuCY8izwJs3Gxf8LqmIvQpgwI1pFsofZnxgf4NcySXCcdRClwc0WBShCBYJ93vRAPx+S r2TrTF/l0WmtPVAIqXIctOt1BjrDQ+1TMZpql9k/gfu9V7iRqp9J3rm0Tw8akOXldU6VFq WipXx/5OypznaZ8/xlFJ8VhsDe56Nhg= Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 22:37:41 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Gabriel C Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Hans de Goede Subject: Re: Linux 5.8-rc1 Message-ID: <20200616203741.GA13437@zn.tnic> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:11:46PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote: > I didn't look closer at that but from the error, it seems to be, > some missing -fstack-protector* vs -fno-stack-protector* checks > somewhere. Can you give exact .config? Also, what compiler exactly? I have CONFIG_CC_HAS_SANE_STACKPROTECTOR=y CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE=y CONFIG_HAVE_STACKPROTECTOR=y CONFIG_CC_HAS_STACKPROTECTOR_NONE=y CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=y CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG=y here and gcc9 builds it fine. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette