Re: [PATCH v6 00/19] The new cgroup slab memory controller

Shakeel Butt
2020-06-17T03:05:56Z

On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 7:41 PM Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 06:46:56PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 4:07 PM Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> wrote:
> > >
[...]
> >
> > Have you performed any [perf] testing on SLAB with this patchset?
>
> The accounting part is the same for SLAB and SLUB, so there should be no
> significant difference. I've checked that it compiles, boots and passes
> kselftests. And that memory savings are there.
>

What about performance? Also you mentioned that sharing kmem-cache
between accounted and non-accounted can have additional overhead. Any
difference between SLAB and SLUB for such a case?