From: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, android-kvm@google.com,
kernel-team@android.com, David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 01/15] arm64: kvm: Fix symbol dependency in __hyp_call_panic_nvhe
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 13:25:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200618122537.9625-2-dbrazdil@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200618122537.9625-1-dbrazdil@google.com>
__hyp_call_panic_nvhe contains inline assembly which did not declare
its dependency on the __hyp_panic_string symbol.
The static-declared string has previously been kept alive because of a use in
__hyp_call_panic_vhe. Fix this in preparation for separating the source files
between VHE and nVHE when the two users land in two different compilation
units. The static variable otherwise gets dropped when compiling the nVHE
source file, causing an undefined symbol linker error later.
Signed-off-by: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
index db1c4487d95d..9270b14157b5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
@@ -897,7 +897,7 @@ static void __hyp_text __hyp_call_panic_nvhe(u64 spsr, u64 elr, u64 par,
* making sure it is a kernel address and not a PC-relative
* reference.
*/
- asm volatile("ldr %0, =__hyp_panic_string" : "=r" (str_va));
+ asm volatile("ldr %0, =%1" : "=r" (str_va) : "S" (__hyp_panic_string));
__hyp_do_panic(str_va,
spsr, elr,
--
2.27.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-18 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-18 12:25 [PATCH v3 00/15] Split off nVHE hyp code David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` David Brazdil [this message]
2020-06-18 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 02/15] arm64: kvm: Move __smccc_workaround_1_smc to .rodata David Brazdil
2020-06-18 13:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-19 9:51 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-19 10:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-18 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 03/15] arm64: kvm: Add build rules for separate nVHE object files David Brazdil
2020-06-18 16:34 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-19 12:11 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 04/15] arm64: kvm: Handle calls to prefixed hyp functions David Brazdil
2020-06-18 16:51 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-18 17:04 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-18 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] arm64: kvm: Build hyp-entry.S separately for VHE/nVHE David Brazdil
2020-06-18 17:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-22 10:20 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-25 8:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-25 11:53 ` David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 06/15] arm64: kvm: Move hyp-init.S to nVHE David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] arm64: kvm: Split hyp/tlb.c to VHE/nVHE David Brazdil
2020-06-19 8:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-18 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] arm64: kvm: Split hyp/switch.c " David Brazdil
2020-06-18 19:52 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-25 5:03 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-25 8:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-25 8:34 ` Will Deacon
2020-06-25 18:26 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-25 16:37 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2020-06-25 17:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-06-18 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] arm64: kvm: Split hyp/debug-sr.c " David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 10/15] arm64: kvm: Split hyp/sysreg-sr.c " David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 11/15] arm64: kvm: Split hyp/timer-sr.c " David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 12/15] arm64: kvm: Compile remaining hyp/ files for both VHE/nVHE David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] arm64: kvm: Add comments around __kvm_nvhe_ symbol aliases David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] arm64: kvm: Remove __hyp_text macro, use build rules instead David Brazdil
2020-06-18 12:25 ` [PATCH v3 15/15] arm64: kvm: Lift instrumentation restrictions on VHE David Brazdil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200618122537.9625-2-dbrazdil@google.com \
--to=dbrazdil@google.com \
--cc=android-kvm@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox