From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9670CC433E0 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:56:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DFBC20723 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:56:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="PZ8vpC5W" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732941AbgFWO4D (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:56:03 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:23282 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732738AbgFWO4C (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:56:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1592924161; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=BfQUOymlgV5QqOOKcP07LKEPi7cgFXRcrD9qQkSmg40=; b=PZ8vpC5WkmQrMkKmR29147iLxXnPTZbxcdHAr+ZxRx7uhENXTWc19EBvaloEBfu7vYN6at Zc6mTDN7oCbWkwWyWnM6ljDw2zFBP8QrnIGs4M/2ZzkgkzLMjz8kQFIHIAzE02z+VWUPnw RIeaFzO96SQeOI6KfMI/c4qGkMpmONE= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-345-6uWunx31MQOANetogtvrFQ-1; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:55:57 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 6uWunx31MQOANetogtvrFQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AC02107ACF2; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:55:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krava (unknown [10.40.192.77]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D80478F0A; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:54:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:54:58 +0200 From: Jiri Olsa To: Alexey Budankov Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Namhyung Kim , Alexander Shishkin , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/13] perf stat: implement control commands handling Message-ID: <20200623145458.GG2619137@krava> References: <0781a077-aa82-5b4a-273e-c17372a72b93@linux.intel.com> <5ed69a1e-052a-9790-7642-cb9c9a53d786@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5ed69a1e-052a-9790-7642-cb9c9a53d786@linux.intel.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:41:30AM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote: > > Implement handling of 'enable' and 'disable' control commands > coming from control file descriptor. process_evlist() function > checks for events on control fds and makes required operations. > If poll event splits initiated timeout interval then the reminder > is calculated and still waited in the following poll() syscall. > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov > --- > tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c > index f88d5ee55022..cc56d71a3ed5 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c > @@ -492,6 +492,31 @@ static bool process_timeout(int timeout, unsigned int interval, int *times) > return print_interval(interval, times); > } > > +static bool process_evlist(struct evlist *evlist, unsigned int interval, int *times) > +{ > + bool stop = false; > + enum evlist_ctl_cmd cmd = EVLIST_CTL_CMD_UNSUPPORTED; > + > + if (evlist__ctlfd_process(evlist, &cmd) > 0) { > + switch (cmd) { > + case EVLIST_CTL_CMD_ENABLE: > + pr_info(EVLIST_ENABLED_MSG); > + stop = print_interval(interval, times); why is interval printed in here? > + break; > + case EVLIST_CTL_CMD_DISABLE: > + stop = print_interval(interval, times); and here? it should be called from the main loop when the interval time is elapsed no? jirka