From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39279C433E0 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 20:36:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 105FB21527 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 20:36:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1592944594; bh=fIBfyEzt853Mv0htINfmpJZz7B+EacMJXTw/nFqBD+4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=fkMrqAX36iKQ5Pfz02yu2yWXonCDMrahEIMetRqhAyJU7X4VD4UVfjIXZVMhhYcup 2eUCOmY2lNDtFawC8EatpVhtcH7ks+v7yczWdTl0cobTWdx6/mipEVLyfdyAYJ4x1H MmxFcdByB34rxOGnXeJFf0ELl3AEl0dqfU7J33rs= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2391782AbgFWUgc (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:36:32 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59434 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2391210AbgFWUgX (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:36:23 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9176E2080C; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 20:36:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1592944583; bh=fIBfyEzt853Mv0htINfmpJZz7B+EacMJXTw/nFqBD+4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=XyM545meY8GXCLodxOZCZejwxEI0GS9juKedMV9K4ivJ8w5B0iYCl2m1/ekAf3ilr /3D35iCKIcQOPDsaslYXiepUqcWRuW6TNjeAlkICx7tQQuXu4h6AZvCIw8N08WdO7y PdQBFt9SergzXHO6nsnBahclJElatLZXZiqs3/I0= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, John Johansen , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.19 046/206] apparmor: fix nnp subset test for unconfined Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 21:56:14 +0200 Message-Id: <20200623195319.245624425@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20200623195316.864547658@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20200623195316.864547658@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: John Johansen [ Upstream commit 3ed4aaa94fc07db3cd0c91be95e3e1b9782a2710 ] The subset test is not taking into account the unconfined exception which will cause profile transitions in the stacked confinement case to fail when no_new_privs is applied. This fixes a regression introduced in the fix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839037 BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844186 Signed-off-by: John Johansen Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- security/apparmor/domain.c | 9 +++++---- security/apparmor/include/label.h | 1 + security/apparmor/label.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/apparmor/domain.c b/security/apparmor/domain.c index b9d5b3459705b..13b33490e0792 100644 --- a/security/apparmor/domain.c +++ b/security/apparmor/domain.c @@ -939,7 +939,8 @@ int apparmor_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm) * aways results in a further reduction of permissions. */ if ((bprm->unsafe & LSM_UNSAFE_NO_NEW_PRIVS) && - !unconfined(label) && !aa_label_is_subset(new, ctx->nnp)) { + !unconfined(label) && + !aa_label_is_unconfined_subset(new, ctx->nnp)) { error = -EPERM; info = "no new privs"; goto audit; @@ -1217,7 +1218,7 @@ int aa_change_hat(const char *hats[], int count, u64 token, int flags) * reduce restrictions. */ if (task_no_new_privs(current) && !unconfined(label) && - !aa_label_is_subset(new, ctx->nnp)) { + !aa_label_is_unconfined_subset(new, ctx->nnp)) { /* not an apparmor denial per se, so don't log it */ AA_DEBUG("no_new_privs - change_hat denied"); error = -EPERM; @@ -1238,7 +1239,7 @@ int aa_change_hat(const char *hats[], int count, u64 token, int flags) * reduce restrictions. */ if (task_no_new_privs(current) && !unconfined(label) && - !aa_label_is_subset(previous, ctx->nnp)) { + !aa_label_is_unconfined_subset(previous, ctx->nnp)) { /* not an apparmor denial per se, so don't log it */ AA_DEBUG("no_new_privs - change_hat denied"); error = -EPERM; @@ -1433,7 +1434,7 @@ check: * reduce restrictions. */ if (task_no_new_privs(current) && !unconfined(label) && - !aa_label_is_subset(new, ctx->nnp)) { + !aa_label_is_unconfined_subset(new, ctx->nnp)) { /* not an apparmor denial per se, so don't log it */ AA_DEBUG("no_new_privs - change_hat denied"); error = -EPERM; diff --git a/security/apparmor/include/label.h b/security/apparmor/include/label.h index 7ce5fe73ae7f5..cecbd3f5429c6 100644 --- a/security/apparmor/include/label.h +++ b/security/apparmor/include/label.h @@ -285,6 +285,7 @@ bool aa_label_init(struct aa_label *label, int size, gfp_t gfp); struct aa_label *aa_label_alloc(int size, struct aa_proxy *proxy, gfp_t gfp); bool aa_label_is_subset(struct aa_label *set, struct aa_label *sub); +bool aa_label_is_unconfined_subset(struct aa_label *set, struct aa_label *sub); struct aa_profile *__aa_label_next_not_in_set(struct label_it *I, struct aa_label *set, struct aa_label *sub); diff --git a/security/apparmor/label.c b/security/apparmor/label.c index 6e7aa2ef8ee0f..6727e6fb69df2 100644 --- a/security/apparmor/label.c +++ b/security/apparmor/label.c @@ -554,6 +554,39 @@ bool aa_label_is_subset(struct aa_label *set, struct aa_label *sub) return __aa_label_next_not_in_set(&i, set, sub) == NULL; } +/** + * aa_label_is_unconfined_subset - test if @sub is a subset of @set + * @set: label to test against + * @sub: label to test if is subset of @set + * + * This checks for subset but taking into account unconfined. IF + * @sub contains an unconfined profile that does not have a matching + * unconfined in @set then this will not cause the test to fail. + * Conversely we don't care about an unconfined in @set that is not in + * @sub + * + * Returns: true if @sub is special_subset of @set + * else false + */ +bool aa_label_is_unconfined_subset(struct aa_label *set, struct aa_label *sub) +{ + struct label_it i = { }; + struct aa_profile *p; + + AA_BUG(!set); + AA_BUG(!sub); + + if (sub == set) + return true; + + do { + p = __aa_label_next_not_in_set(&i, set, sub); + if (p && !profile_unconfined(p)) + break; + } while (p); + + return p == NULL; +} /** -- 2.25.1