public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@matbug.net>
Cc: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Chris Redpath <chris.redpath@arm.com>,
	Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/uclamp: Protect uclamp fast path code with static key
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 14:28:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200624122819.GG4781@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pn9oor2t.derkling@matbug.net>

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 09:34:02AM +0200, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> > +static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(sched_uclamp_unused);
> 
> I would personally prefer a non negated semantic.

That's what I said earlier as well.


> > +	 */
> > +	if (static_branch_likely(&sched_uclamp_unused))
> > +		return;
> 
> Moreover, something like:
> 
>        if (static_key_false(&sched_uclamp_enabled))
>                 return;
> 
> is not just good enough?

static_key_true/false() are the deprecated API.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-24 12:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-19 17:20 [PATCH v2 0/2] sched: Optionally skip uclamp logic in fast path Qais Yousef
2020-06-19 17:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/uclamp: Fix initialization of strut uclamp_rq Qais Yousef
2020-06-24  7:26   ` Patrick Bellasi
2020-06-24 10:36     ` Qais Yousef
2020-06-19 17:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/uclamp: Protect uclamp fast path code with static key Qais Yousef
2020-06-24  7:34   ` Patrick Bellasi
2020-06-24 11:07     ` Qais Yousef
2020-06-24 12:28     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-06-23 17:39 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] sched: Optionally skip uclamp logic in fast path Dietmar Eggemann
2020-06-24  9:00   ` Vincent Guittot
2020-06-24 12:26     ` Qais Yousef

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200624122819.GG4781@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=chris.redpath@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=patrick.bellasi@matbug.net \
    --cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox