From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Don Porter <porter@cs.unc.edu>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, luto@kernel.org,
hpa@zytor.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
ravi.v.shankar@intel.com, chang.seok.bae@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 00/18] Enable FSGSBASE instructions
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 00:37:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200625213705.GF20341@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ef8bbdff-e891-bee3-677d-3606474ecc10@cs.unc.edu>
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 11:27:28AM -0400, Don Porter wrote:
> On 5/29/20 11:27 AM, Wojtek Porczyk wrote:
> > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 11:38:01AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > > One useful test for the actual kernel patches would be to run your SGX
> > > workload on a loaded core. That is, do something like taskset -c
> > > 0 graphene_thing and, simultaneously, write a trivial infinite loop program
> > > and run that under taskset -c 0 as well. For good measure, you could have
> > > perf top or perf record running at the same time. Look for kernel errors,
> > > but also look for any evidence of your workload malfunctioning.
> >
> > We currently run as part of CI several workloads[1], among them LTP tests[2],
> > and sometimes it's not pretty, because we encounter stability problems in
> > Graphene+SGX even without the patchset. We'll pick some stable subset and
> > will let know. Right now we'll have to retool CI for custom kernels, which
> > will take some back and forth with uni's admins.
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/oscarlab/graphene/tree/master/Examples
> > [2] https://github.com/oscarlab/graphene/tree/master/LibOS/shim/test/ltp
> >
>
> Following up: we have been running a patched 5.7 kernel with v12 of this
> series on one of our CI workers. As Wojtek mentions, infrastructure and
> other orthogonal issues took some time.
>
> We have run our complete SGX testing pipelines successfully several times
> with no issues: no errors in Graphene or suspicious kernel messages.
>
> I also did Andy's suggested test:
> * Graphene running nginx pinned to core 0
> * infinite loop on core 0
> * perf top running
> * Exercised with non-SGX apache bench several times (~10 minutes of testing
> time) also from core 0
>
> Again, no apparent issues, nothing in dmesg. I ran a similar setup with our
> SGX-specific Graphene (PAL) unit tests. Same story: everything looks good.
>
> Let us know if we can be of any more help here.
>
> Thanks,
> Don
Can unmodified Graphene-SGX used with these changes?
/Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-25 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-11 4:52 [PATCH v12 00/18] Enable FSGSBASE instructions Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:52 ` [PATCH v12 01/18] x86/ptrace: Prevent ptrace from clearing the FS/GS selector Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:52 ` [PATCH v12 02/18] selftests/x86/fsgsbase: Test GS selector on ptracer-induced GS base write Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:52 ` [PATCH v12 03/18] x86/cpu: Add 'unsafe_fsgsbase' to enable CR4.FSGSBASE Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:52 ` [PATCH v12 04/18] x86/entry/64: Clean up paranoid exit Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:52 ` [PATCH v12 05/18] x86/entry/64: Switch CR3 before SWAPGS in paranoid entry Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:52 ` [PATCH v12 06/18] x86/entry/64: Introduce the FIND_PERCPU_BASE macro Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:53 ` [PATCH v12 07/18] x86/entry/64: Handle FSGSBASE enabled paranoid entry/exit Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:53 ` [PATCH v12 08/18] x86/entry/64: Document GSBASE handling in the paranoid path Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:53 ` [PATCH v12 09/18] x86/fsgsbase/64: Add intrinsics for FSGSBASE instructions Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:53 ` [PATCH v12 10/18] x86/fsgsbase/64: Enable FSGSBASE instructions in helper functions Sasha Levin
2020-05-18 18:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-18 20:24 ` Sasha Levin
2020-05-18 22:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-19 12:20 ` David Laight
2020-05-19 14:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-20 9:13 ` David Laight
2020-05-11 4:53 ` [PATCH v12 11/18] x86/fsgsbase/64: Use FSGSBASE in switch_to() if available Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:53 ` [PATCH v12 12/18] x86/fsgsbase/64: move save_fsgs to header file Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:53 ` [PATCH v12 13/18] x86/fsgsbase/64: Use FSGSBASE instructions on thread copy and ptrace Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:53 ` [PATCH v12 14/18] x86/speculation/swapgs: Check FSGSBASE in enabling SWAPGS mitigation Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:53 ` [PATCH v12 15/18] selftests/x86/fsgsbase: Test ptracer-induced GS base write with FSGSBASE Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:53 ` [PATCH v12 16/18] x86/fsgsbase/64: Enable FSGSBASE on 64bit by default and add a chicken bit Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:53 ` [PATCH v12 17/18] x86/elf: Enumerate kernel FSGSBASE capability in AT_HWCAP2 Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:53 ` [PATCH v12 18/18] Documentation/x86/64: Add documentation for GS/FS addressing mode Sasha Levin
2020-05-15 9:24 ` [PATCH v12 00/18] Enable FSGSBASE instructions Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-15 16:40 ` Sasha Levin
2020-05-15 17:55 ` Andi Kleen
2020-05-15 23:07 ` Sasha Levin
2020-05-16 12:21 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-16 9:50 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-18 15:34 ` Andi Kleen
2020-05-18 20:01 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-18 23:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-19 16:48 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-22 20:14 ` Don Porter
2020-05-22 20:55 ` Dave Hansen
2020-05-23 0:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-24 19:45 ` hpa
2020-05-24 21:19 ` Sasha Levin
2020-05-24 23:44 ` hpa
2020-05-25 7:54 ` Richard Weinberger
2020-05-25 21:56 ` Tony Luck
2020-05-26 8:12 ` David Laight
2020-05-26 8:23 ` Richard Weinberger
2020-05-27 8:31 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-26 12:42 ` Don Porter
2020-05-26 20:27 ` Sasha Levin
2020-05-26 22:03 ` Don Porter
2020-05-26 22:51 ` Sasha Levin
2020-05-28 17:37 ` Don Porter
2020-05-28 10:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-28 17:40 ` Don Porter
2020-05-28 18:38 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-05-29 15:27 ` Wojtek Porczyk
2020-06-25 15:27 ` Don Porter
2020-06-25 21:37 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2020-07-18 18:19 ` Don Porter
2020-07-23 3:23 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-28 19:19 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-28 19:41 ` Sasha Levin
2020-05-29 3:07 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-29 3:10 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-25 15:30 ` Don Porter
2020-06-25 21:40 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-23 4:19 ` Andi Kleen
2020-05-28 10:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-27 8:20 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-27 12:42 ` Wojtek Porczyk
2020-05-18 9:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-18 15:16 ` Sasha Levin
2020-05-18 18:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-18 19:36 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-18 6:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18 12:33 ` Sasha Levin
2020-05-18 14:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200625213705.GF20341@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=porter@cs.unc.edu \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).