From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F26C433E0 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 18:51:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F4E3204EC for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 18:51:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729661AbgF2Svk (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 14:51:40 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:58883 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729630AbgF2Svf (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 14:51:35 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 335C268B05; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:12:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:12:55 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Marion & Christophe JAILLET Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Guenter Roeck , Geert Uytterhoeven , Marek Szyprowski , Robin Murphy , David Rientjes , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dma-pool: Fix too large DMA pools on medium systems Message-ID: <20200629081255.GA32155@lst.de> References: <20200608132217.29945-1-geert@linux-m68k.org> <20200620200936.GA106151@roeck-us.net> <20200624073815.GE18609@lst.de> <6473db8e-4116-c994-aa08-6b50a6c609fb@wanadoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6473db8e-4116-c994-aa08-6b50a6c609fb@wanadoo.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 06:13:43PM +0200, Marion & Christophe JAILLET wrote: > I'm sorry, but I will not send pci_ --> dma_ conversion for this driver. > I'm a bit puzzled by some choice of GFP_KERNEL and GFP_ATOMIC that not all > that obvious to me. > > I'll try to send some patches for other easier drivers in the coming weeks. No problem, I sent a patch for the conversion of the allocations that caused problems.