From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: willy@infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: alternative to xa_for_each?
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 07:02:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200701060239.GA27121@infradead.org> (raw)
Hi Matthew,
I'm just reviewing a patch adding an xarray user, and I'm wondering
if we could just replace xa_for_each with a loop on
xa_find_after with a magic index to start from the beginning? That
would always seem like more readable code than the magic looping macro.
And while we're at it: is there an idiomatic way to get the entry with
the highest index?
next reply other threads:[~2020-07-01 6:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-01 6:02 Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-07-01 14:37 ` alternative to xa_for_each? Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200701060239.GA27121@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox