From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@ozlabs.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] powerpc/pseries: use smp_rmb() in H_CONFER spin yield
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 10:28:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200702082840.GC4781@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200702074839.1057733-3-npiggin@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 05:48:33PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> There is no need for rmb(), this allows faster lwsync here.
Since you determined this; I'm thinking you actually understand the
ordering here. How about recording this understanding in a comment?
Also, should the lock->slock load not use READ_ONCE() ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-02 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-02 7:48 [PATCH 0/8] powerpc: queued spinlocks and rwlocks Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-02 7:48 ` [PATCH 1/8] powerpc/powernv: must include hvcall.h to get PAPR defines Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-02 7:48 ` [PATCH 2/8] powerpc/pseries: use smp_rmb() in H_CONFER spin yield Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-02 8:28 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-07-02 10:36 ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-02 7:48 ` [PATCH 3/8] powerpc/pseries: move some PAPR paravirt functions to their own file Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-02 7:48 ` [PATCH 4/8] powerpc: move spinlock implementation to simple_spinlock Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-02 7:48 ` [PATCH 5/8] powerpc/64s: implement queued spinlocks and rwlocks Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-02 8:02 ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02 10:25 ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-02 10:35 ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02 10:47 ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-02 10:48 ` Will Deacon
2020-07-03 10:52 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-02 7:48 ` [PATCH 6/8] powerpc/pseries: implement paravirt qspinlocks for SPLPAR Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-02 16:15 ` kernel test robot
2020-07-03 0:36 ` Waiman Long
2020-07-02 21:01 ` Waiman Long
2020-07-02 7:48 ` [PATCH 7/8] powerpc/qspinlock: optimised atomic_try_cmpxchg_lock that adds the lock hint Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-02 7:48 ` [PATCH 8/8] powerpc/64s: remove paravirt from simple spinlocks (RFC only) Nicholas Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200702082840.GC4781@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=anton@ozlabs.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox