From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A43BC433E1 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 10:12:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3119E20772 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 10:12:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728363AbgGBKMz (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2020 06:12:55 -0400 Received: from elvis.franken.de ([193.175.24.41]:46108 "EHLO elvis.franken.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728210AbgGBKMz (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2020 06:12:55 -0400 Received: from uucp (helo=alpha) by elvis.franken.de with local-bsmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1jqwD4-0001E1-00; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 12:12:50 +0200 Received: by alpha.franken.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 151F3C0725; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 12:12:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 12:12:29 +0200 From: Thomas Bogendoerfer To: Fabio Estevam Cc: =?utf-8?B?5ZGo55Cw5p2wIChaaG91IFlhbmppZSk=?= , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Rob Herring , paul@crapouillou.net, dongsheng.qiu@ingenic.com, aric.pzqi@ingenic.com, rick.tyliu@ingenic.com, yanfei.li@ingenic.com, sernia.zhou@foxmail.com, zhenwenjin@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] dt-bindings: MIPS: Document Ingenic SoCs binding. Message-ID: <20200702101229.GA9924@alpha.franken.de> References: <20200602183354.39707-1-zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com> <20200602183354.39707-2-zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com> <20200619110524.GA9391@alpha.franken.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 04:28:31PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 9:48 AM Thomas Bogendoerfer > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 02:33:54AM +0800, 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) wrote: > > > Document the available properties for the SoC root node and the > > > CPU nodes of the devicetree for the Ingenic XBurst SoCs. > > > > > > Tested-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller > > > Tested-by: Paul Boddie > > > Signed-off-by: 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) > > > --- > > > > > > Notes: > > > v1->v2: > > > 1.Remove unnecessary "items". > > > 2.Add "clocks" as suggested by Paul Cercueil. > > > > > > .../bindings/mips/ingenic/ingenic,cpu.yaml | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/ingenic/ingenic,cpu.yaml > > > > applied to mips-next. > > This causes 'make dt_binding_check' to fail: > > $ make dt_binding_check > CHKDT Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/ingenic/ingenic,cpu.yaml > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/ingenic/ingenic,cpu.yaml: > while scanning a block scalar > in "", line 42, column 5 > found a tab character where an indentation space is expected > in "", line 46, column 1 > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/Makefile:20: recipe for target > 'Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/ingenic/ingenic,cpu.example.dts' > failed > make[1]: *** [Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/ingenic/ingenic,cpu.example.dts] > Error 1 > Makefile:1343: recipe for target 'dt_binding_check' failed > make: *** [dt_binding_check] Error 2 thank you for noticing. It's my fault, I've changed spaces into tabs while applying, which is of course wrong for yaml files... I've commited a fix for this to mips-next and 'make dt_binding_check' now passes for me. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]