Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: pm: add missing put_device() call in at91_pm_sram_init()

[Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>]

Hi,

On 04/06/2020 20:33:01+0800, yu kuai wrote:
> if of_find_device_by_node() succeed, at91_pm_sram_init() doesn't have
> a corresponding put_device(). Thus add a jump target to fix the exception
> handling for this function implementation.
> 
> Fixes: d2e467905596 ("ARM: at91: pm: use the mmio-sram pool to access SRAM")
> Signed-off-by: yu kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c | 11 ++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> index 074bde64064e..2aab043441e8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> @@ -592,13 +592,13 @@ static void __init at91_pm_sram_init(void)
>  	sram_pool = gen_pool_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);

Isn't the best solution to simply have put_device here?

>  	if (!sram_pool) {
>  		pr_warn("%s: sram pool unavailable!\n", __func__);
> -		return;
> +		goto out_put_device;
>  	}
>  
>  	sram_base = gen_pool_alloc(sram_pool, at91_pm_suspend_in_sram_sz);
>  	if (!sram_base) {
>  		pr_warn("%s: unable to alloc sram!\n", __func__);
> -		return;
> +		goto out_put_device;
>  	}
>  
>  	sram_pbase = gen_pool_virt_to_phys(sram_pool, sram_base);
> @@ -606,12 +606,17 @@ static void __init at91_pm_sram_init(void)
>  					at91_pm_suspend_in_sram_sz, false);
>  	if (!at91_suspend_sram_fn) {
>  		pr_warn("SRAM: Could not map\n");
> -		return;
> +		goto out_put_device;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Copy the pm suspend handler to SRAM */
>  	at91_suspend_sram_fn = fncpy(at91_suspend_sram_fn,
>  			&at91_pm_suspend_in_sram, at91_pm_suspend_in_sram_sz);
> +	return;
> +
> +out_put_device:
> +	put_device(&pdev->dev);
> +	return;
>  }
>  
>  static bool __init at91_is_pm_mode_active(int pm_mode)
> -- 
> 2.25.4
> 

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com