[for-next][PATCH 08/18] tracing: not necessary to define DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT to be empty again

Steven Rostedt
2020-07-02T21:59:26Z

From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>

After the previous cleanup, DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT's definition has no
relationship with DEFINE_EVENT. So After we re-define DEFINE_EVENT, it
is not necessary to define DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT to be empty again.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200612092844.56107-5-richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com

Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
include/trace/trace_events.h | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/trace/trace_events.h b/include/trace/trace_events.h
index 43023c3e9d74..1bc3e7bba9a4 100644
--- a/include/trace/trace_events.h
+++ b/include/trace/trace_events.h
@@ -709,9 +709,6 @@ static inline void ftrace_test_probe_##call(void) \
check_trace_callback_type_##call(trace_event_raw_event_##template); \
}

-#undef DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT
-#define DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT(template, name, proto, args, print)
-
#include TRACE_INCLUDE(TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE)

#undef __entry
--
2.26.2