public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	mgorman@suse.de, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	david@fromorbit.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: Better document ttwu()
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 13:36:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200703113603.GL117543@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200703083012.GU4800@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 10:30:12AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 07:39:16PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> > > @@ -3134,8 +3274,12 @@ static inline void prepare_task(struct task_struct *next)
> > >       /*
> > >        * Claim the task as running, we do this before switching to it
> > >        * such that any running task will have this set.
> > > +	 *
> > > +	 * __schedule()'s rq->lock and smp_mb__after_spin_lock() orders this
> > > +	 * store against prior state change of @next, also see
> > > +	 * try_to_wake_up(), specifically smp_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu).
> > 
> > smp_*cond*_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu, <blah>)
> 
> Both, but yeah.. arguably the cond one is the more important one.

Ah no, this one really want to match the WF_ON_CPU case. I'll clarify
non-the-less.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-03 11:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-02 12:52 [RFC][PATCH] sched: Better document ttwu() Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-02 13:13 ` Phil Auld
2020-07-02 15:23   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-02 18:39 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-07-03  8:30   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-03 11:36     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-07-03 10:12 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-07-03 12:39 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-07-22  9:12 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200703113603.GL117543@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox