From: "Marek Behún" <marek.behun@nic.cz>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Ondrej Jirman <megous@megous.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>,
Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>,
"open list:LED SUBSYSTEM" <linux-leds@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] leds: Add support for per-LED device triggers
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 16:56:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200708165619.0321d3db@dellmb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200704125900.GA20503@amd>
On Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:59:00 +0200
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Some criticism to this approach to HW triggers:
> > - every hw trigger for each LED has to be registered via current
> > trigger API. This will grow code size and memory footprint once
> > this API is widely used
> > - one HW trigger can only master one LED device (via private_led
> > member). So if I have, for example an ethernet switch with 8
> > ports, and each port has 2 LEDs, and each LED has 10 possible HW
> > triggering mechanisms, with your proposed API one would need to
> > register 8*2*10 = 160 triggers
>
> Well, code is simple, and so far I have seen 2 HW triggering
> mechanisms, not 10. Maybe we should have a function to regiter a hw
> trigger for a LED, so that internal implementation can be changed
> more easily.
>
> Ondrej: You already have code using this, right? Can we get an
> example?
>
> > I too have been thinking about an API for HW LED triggers, and I
> > tinkered with it a little. Some time ago I sent some emails, with
> > subjects:
> > "RFC: LED hw triggering API"
> > "about my trigger-sources work"
>
> Perhaps it is time to send them one more time, so Ondrej can say if it
> works for him/looks okay for him?
>
> > My current thoughts about how HW LED triggers could work nicely is
> > as such:
> > - these members (maybe with different names) shall be added to
> > struct led_classdev:
> > available_hw_triggers()
> > - shall return a NULL terminated list of HW trigger names
> > available for this LED
> > set_hw_trigger()
> > - sets HW trigger for this LED. The LED triggering API shall
> > call this method after previous LED trigger is unset. If
> > called with NULL parameter, unsets HW trigger
> > current_hw_trigger
> > - name of the currently set HW LED trigger for this LED
> > - the driver registering the LED cdev informs abouth the LED being
> > capable of HW triggering - members available_hw_triggers and
> > set_hw_trigger must be set
> > - SW LED trigger and HW LED trigger are mutualy exclusive on one
> > LED
> > - the trigger file in sysfs (/sys/class/leds/LED/trigger) shall
> > first list the available SW triggers, and then available hw
> > triggers for this LED, prefixed with "hw:"
> > When written, if the written trigger name starts with "hw:",
> > instead of setting SW trigger, a HW trigger is set via
> > set_hw_trigger() method
>
> This does not sound bad, either.
>
> Best regards,
> Pavel
Hi Pavel
I shall try to implement this and send a proposal within 2 weeks.
Marek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-08 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-02 14:47 [PATCH RFC] leds: Add support for per-LED device triggers Ondrej Jirman
2020-07-02 14:51 ` Ondřej Jirman
2020-07-03 10:06 ` Marek Behún
2020-07-03 13:08 ` Ondřej Jirman
2020-07-08 14:55 ` Marek Behún
2020-07-04 12:59 ` Pavel Machek
2020-07-08 14:56 ` Marek Behún [this message]
2020-07-04 12:04 ` Pavel Machek
2020-07-04 12:17 ` Ondřej Jirman
2020-07-04 20:07 ` Pavel Machek
2020-07-11 10:04 ` Pavel Machek
2020-07-11 21:01 ` Ondřej Jirman
2020-07-12 7:25 ` Pavel Machek
2020-07-12 13:49 ` Ondřej Jirman
2020-07-12 19:11 ` Pavel Machek
2020-07-12 21:10 ` Marek Behun
2020-07-12 22:12 ` Ondřej Jirman
2020-07-12 22:38 ` Ondřej Jirman
2020-07-12 23:15 ` Marek Behun
2020-07-12 23:18 ` Marek Behun
2020-07-13 7:12 ` Pavel Machek
2020-07-12 23:20 ` Ondřej Jirman
2020-07-13 1:56 ` Ondřej Jirman
2020-07-15 17:07 ` Marek Behún
2020-07-15 17:55 ` Marek Behún
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200708165619.0321d3db@dellmb \
--to=marek.behun@nic.cz \
--cc=dmurphy@ti.com \
--cc=jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=megous@megous.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox