From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, mhiramat@kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bristot@redhat.com,
jbaron@akamai.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org, namit@vmware.com,
hpa@zytor.com, luto@kernel.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
jpoimboe@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/17] static_call: Avoid kprobes on inline static_call()s
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 18:00:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200710180014.08803c91@oasis.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200710134336.619632370@infradead.org>
On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 15:38:39 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> Similar to how we disallow kprobes on any other dynamic text
> (ftrace/jump_label) also disallow kprobes on inline static_call()s.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
I'd like to have Masami review this patch too.
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c | 4 +-
> include/linux/static_call.h | 11 +++++++
> kernel/kprobes.c | 2 +
> kernel/static_call.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> #include <linux/ftrace.h>
> #include <linux/frame.h>
> #include <linux/pgtable.h>
> +#include <linux/static_call.h>
>
> #include <asm/text-patching.h>
> #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> @@ -209,7 +210,8 @@ static int copy_optimized_instructions(u
> /* Check whether the address range is reserved */
> if (ftrace_text_reserved(src, src + len - 1) ||
> alternatives_text_reserved(src, src + len - 1) ||
> - jump_label_text_reserved(src, src + len - 1))
> + jump_label_text_reserved(src, src + len - 1) ||
> + static_call_text_reserved(src, src + len - 1))
> return -EBUSY;
>
> return len;
> --- a/include/linux/static_call.h
> +++ b/include/linux/static_call.h
> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ struct static_call_key {
>
> extern void __static_call_update(struct static_call_key *key, void *tramp, void *func);
> extern int static_call_mod_init(struct module *mod);
> +extern int static_call_text_reserved(void *start, void *end);
>
> #define DEFINE_STATIC_CALL(name, _func) \
> DECLARE_STATIC_CALL(name, _func); \
> @@ -153,6 +154,11 @@ void __static_call_update(struct static_
> cpus_read_unlock();
> }
>
> +static inline int static_call_text_reserved(void *start, void *end)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> #define EXPORT_STATIC_CALL(name) \
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(STATIC_CALL_KEY(name)); \
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(STATIC_CALL_TRAMP(name))
> @@ -182,6 +188,11 @@ void __static_call_update(struct static_
> WRITE_ONCE(key->func, func);
> }
>
> +static inline int static_call_text_reserved(void *start, void *end)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> #define EXPORT_STATIC_CALL(name) EXPORT_SYMBOL(STATIC_CALL_KEY(name))
> #define EXPORT_STATIC_CALL_GPL(name) EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(STATIC_CALL_KEY(name))
>
> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
> #include <linux/ftrace.h>
> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> #include <linux/jump_label.h>
> +#include <linux/static_call.h>
>
> #include <asm/sections.h>
> #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> @@ -1591,6 +1592,7 @@ static int check_kprobe_address_safe(str
> if (!kernel_text_address((unsigned long) p->addr) ||
> within_kprobe_blacklist((unsigned long) p->addr) ||
> jump_label_text_reserved(p->addr, p->addr) ||
> + static_call_text_reserved(p->addr, p->addr) ||
> find_bug((unsigned long)p->addr)) {
> ret = -EINVAL;
> goto out;
> --- a/kernel/static_call.c
> +++ b/kernel/static_call.c
> @@ -204,8 +204,58 @@ static int __static_call_init(struct mod
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int addr_conflict(struct static_call_site *site, void *start, void *end)
> +{
> + unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)static_call_addr(site);
> +
> + if (addr <= (unsigned long)end &&
> + addr + CALL_INSN_SIZE > (unsigned long)start)
> + return 1;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __static_call_text_reserved(struct static_call_site *iter_start,
> + struct static_call_site *iter_stop,
> + void *start, void *end)
> +{
> + struct static_call_site *iter = iter_start;
> +
> + while (iter < iter_stop) {
> + if (addr_conflict(iter, start, end))
> + return 1;
> + iter++;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
>
> +static int __static_call_mod_text_reserved(void *start, void *end)
> +{
> + struct module *mod;
> + int ret;
> +
> + preempt_disable();
> + mod = __module_text_address((unsigned long)start);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(__module_text_address((unsigned long)end) != mod);
> + if (!try_module_get(mod))
> + mod = NULL;
> + preempt_enable();
> +
> + if (!mod)
> + return 0;
> +
> + ret = __static_call_text_reserved(mod->static_call_sites,
> + mod->static_call_sites + mod->num_static_call_sites,
> + start, end);
> +
> + module_put(mod);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int static_call_add_module(struct module *mod)
> {
> return __static_call_init(mod, mod->static_call_sites,
> @@ -275,6 +325,20 @@ static struct notifier_block static_call
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_MODULES */
>
> +int static_call_text_reserved(void *start, void *end)
> +{
> + int ret = __static_call_text_reserved(__start_static_call_sites,
> + __stop_static_call_sites, start, end);
> +
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
> + ret = __static_call_mod_text_reserved(start, end);
> +#endif
Nit, but why not have a #else /* !CONFIG_MODULE */ above and just:
static inline int __static_call_mod_text_reserve(..)
{
return 0;
}
#endif
?
Then you don't need the extra #ifdef above, and just end it with:
return __static_call_mod_next_reserved(start, end);
-- Steve
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static void __init static_call_init(void)
> {
> int ret;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-10 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-10 13:38 [PATCH v6 00/17] Add static_call Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 01/17] notifier: Fix broken error handling pattern Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 02/17] module: Fix up module_notifier return values Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 03/17] module: Properly propagate MODULE_STATE_COMING failure Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 04/17] jump_label,module: Fix module lifetime for __jump_label_mod_text_reserved Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 05/17] compiler.h: Make __ADDRESSABLE() symbol truly unique Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 06/17] static_call: Add basic static call infrastructure Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 21:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 07/17] static_call: Add inline " Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 21:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 08/17] static_call: Avoid kprobes on inline static_call()s Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 22:00 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2020-07-11 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 09/17] x86/static_call: Add out-of-line static call implementation Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 22:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-11 10:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 10/17] x86/static_call: Add inline static call implementation for x86-64 Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 22:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-11 9:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 11/17] static_call: Simple self-test Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 22:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-11 10:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-13 20:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 12/17] x86/alternatives: Teach text_poke_bp() to emulate RET Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 22:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 13/17] static_call: Add static_call_cond() Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 23:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-11 5:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-11 10:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-13 20:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-14 9:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 14/17] static_call: Handle tail-calls Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-11 0:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-11 5:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-11 5:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 15/17] static_call: Allow early init Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-11 1:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-11 5:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-13 20:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-14 9:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-14 14:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-14 15:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-14 16:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-14 18:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-14 19:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 16/17] tracepoint: Optimize using static_call() Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 17/17] x86/perf, static_call: Optimize x86_pmu methods Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200710180014.08803c91@oasis.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox