From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mhiramat@kernel.org, bristot@redhat.com, jbaron@akamai.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@kernel.org, namit@vmware.com, hpa@zytor.com,
luto@kernel.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 13/17] static_call: Add static_call_cond()
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 19:08:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200710190825.02c75c04@oasis.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200710134336.918547865@infradead.org>
On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 15:38:44 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> +static void __static_call_transform(void *insn, enum insn_type type, void *func)
> {
> - const void *code = text_gen_insn(opcode, insn, func);
> + int size = CALL_INSN_SIZE;
> + const void *code;
>
> - if (WARN_ONCE(*(u8 *)insn != opcode,
> - "unexpected static call insn opcode 0x%x at %pS\n",
> - opcode, insn))
I would still feel better if we did some sort of sanity check before
just writing to the text. Confirm this is a jmp, call, ret or nop?
-- Steve
> - return;
> + switch (type) {
> + case CALL:
> + code = text_gen_insn(CALL_INSN_OPCODE, insn, func);
> + break;
> +
> + case NOP:
> + code = ideal_nops[NOP_ATOMIC5];
> + break;
> +
> + case JMP:
> + code = text_gen_insn(JMP32_INSN_OPCODE, insn, func);
> + break;
> +
> + case RET:
> + code = text_gen_insn(RET_INSN_OPCODE, insn, func);
> + size = RET_INSN_SIZE;
> + break;
> + }
>
> - if (memcmp(insn, code, CALL_INSN_SIZE) == 0)
> + if (memcmp(insn, code, size) == 0)
> return;
>
> - text_poke_bp(insn, code, CALL_INSN_SIZE, NULL);
> + text_poke_bp(insn, code, size, NULL);
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-10 23:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-10 13:38 [PATCH v6 00/17] Add static_call Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 01/17] notifier: Fix broken error handling pattern Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 02/17] module: Fix up module_notifier return values Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 03/17] module: Properly propagate MODULE_STATE_COMING failure Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 04/17] jump_label,module: Fix module lifetime for __jump_label_mod_text_reserved Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 05/17] compiler.h: Make __ADDRESSABLE() symbol truly unique Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 06/17] static_call: Add basic static call infrastructure Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 21:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 07/17] static_call: Add inline " Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 21:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 08/17] static_call: Avoid kprobes on inline static_call()s Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 22:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-11 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 09/17] x86/static_call: Add out-of-line static call implementation Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 22:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-11 10:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 10/17] x86/static_call: Add inline static call implementation for x86-64 Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 22:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-11 9:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 11/17] static_call: Simple self-test Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 22:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-11 10:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-13 20:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 12/17] x86/alternatives: Teach text_poke_bp() to emulate RET Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 22:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 13/17] static_call: Add static_call_cond() Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 23:08 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2020-07-11 5:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-11 10:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-13 20:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-14 9:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 14/17] static_call: Handle tail-calls Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-11 0:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-11 5:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-11 5:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 15/17] static_call: Allow early init Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-11 1:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-11 5:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-13 20:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-14 9:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-14 14:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-14 15:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-14 16:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-14 18:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-14 19:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 16/17] tracepoint: Optimize using static_call() Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 17/17] x86/perf, static_call: Optimize x86_pmu methods Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200710190825.02c75c04@oasis.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox