From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: mhiramat@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bristot@redhat.com,
jbaron@akamai.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org, namit@vmware.com,
hpa@zytor.com, luto@kernel.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
jpoimboe@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/17] static_call: Avoid kprobes on inline static_call()s
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 12:30:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200711103053.GD597537@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200710180014.08803c91@oasis.local.home>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 06:00:14PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > +int static_call_text_reserved(void *start, void *end)
> > +{
> > + int ret = __static_call_text_reserved(__start_static_call_sites,
> > + __stop_static_call_sites, start, end);
> > +
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
> > + ret = __static_call_mod_text_reserved(start, end);
> > +#endif
>
> Nit, but why not have a #else /* !CONFIG_MODULE */ above and just:
>
> static inline int __static_call_mod_text_reserve(..)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> #endif
>
> ?
Done.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-11 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-10 13:38 [PATCH v6 00/17] Add static_call Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 01/17] notifier: Fix broken error handling pattern Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 02/17] module: Fix up module_notifier return values Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 03/17] module: Properly propagate MODULE_STATE_COMING failure Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 04/17] jump_label,module: Fix module lifetime for __jump_label_mod_text_reserved Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 05/17] compiler.h: Make __ADDRESSABLE() symbol truly unique Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 06/17] static_call: Add basic static call infrastructure Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 21:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 07/17] static_call: Add inline " Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 21:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 08/17] static_call: Avoid kprobes on inline static_call()s Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 22:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-11 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 09/17] x86/static_call: Add out-of-line static call implementation Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 22:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-11 10:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 10/17] x86/static_call: Add inline static call implementation for x86-64 Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 22:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-11 9:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 11/17] static_call: Simple self-test Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 22:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-11 10:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-13 20:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 12/17] x86/alternatives: Teach text_poke_bp() to emulate RET Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 22:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 13/17] static_call: Add static_call_cond() Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 23:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-11 5:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-11 10:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-13 20:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-14 9:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 14/17] static_call: Handle tail-calls Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-11 0:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-11 5:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-11 5:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 15/17] static_call: Allow early init Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-11 1:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-11 5:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-13 20:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-14 9:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-14 14:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-14 15:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-14 16:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-14 18:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-14 19:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 16/17] tracepoint: Optimize using static_call() Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 17/17] x86/perf, static_call: Optimize x86_pmu methods Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200711103053.GD597537@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox