public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
To: Arnaud Ferraris <arnaud.ferraris@collabora.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Timur Tabi <timur@kernel.org>,
	Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	kernel@collabora.com, Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: fsl_asrc: allow selecting arbitrary clocks
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 13:15:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200714201544.GA10501@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3fea8912-63df-ff27-0c29-6284a85107ab@collabora.com>

On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 06:20:32PM +0200, Arnaud Ferraris wrote:
> >>> The current ASRC driver hardcodes the input and output clocks used for
> >>> sample rate conversions. In order to allow greater flexibility and to
> >>> cover more use cases, it would be preferable to select the clocks using
> >>> device-tree properties.
> >>
> >> We recent just merged a new change that auto-selecting internal
> >> clocks based on sample rates as the first option -- ideal ratio
> >> mode is the fallback mode now. Please refer to:
> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?h=next-20200702&id=d0250cf4f2abfbea64ed247230f08f5ae23979f0

> I finally got some time to test and debug clock auto-selection on my
> system, and unfortunately couldn't get it to work.
> 
> Here's some background about my use case: the i.MX6 board acts as a
> Bluetooth proxy between a phone and a headset. It has 2 Bluetooth
> modules (one for each connected device), with audio connected to SSI1 &
> SSI2. Audio sample rate can be either 8 or 16kHz, and bclk can be either
> 512 or 1024kHz, all depending of the capabilities of the headset and phone.
> In our case we want SSI2 to be the input clock to the ASRC and SSI1 the
> output clock, but there is no way to force that with auto-selection:
> both clocks are multiples of both 8k and 16k, so the algorithm will
> always select the SSI1 clock.

Anything wrong with ASRC selecting SSI1 clock for both cases? The
driver calculates the divisors based on the given clock rate, so
the final internal rate should be the same. If there's a problem,
I feel that's a separate bug.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-14 20:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-02 14:22 [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: fsl_asrc: allow selecting arbitrary clocks Arnaud Ferraris
2020-07-02 14:22 ` [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: sound: fsl,asrc: add properties to select in/out clocks Arnaud Ferraris
2020-07-02 14:22 ` [PATCH 2/4] ASoC: fsl_asrc: allow using arbitrary input and output clocks Arnaud Ferraris
2020-07-02 14:22 ` [PATCH 3/4] ASoC: fsl_asrc: always use ratio for conversion Arnaud Ferraris
2020-07-02 14:22 ` [PATCH 4/4] ASoC: fsl_asrc: swap input and output clocks in capture mode Arnaud Ferraris
2020-07-02 18:42 ` [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: fsl_asrc: allow selecting arbitrary clocks Nicolin Chen
2020-07-03  9:38   ` Arnaud Ferraris
2020-07-14 16:20     ` Arnaud Ferraris
2020-07-14 20:15       ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2020-07-14 20:27         ` Mark Brown
2020-07-14 20:50           ` Nicolin Chen
2020-07-15 14:05             ` Mark Brown
2020-07-15 16:18               ` Arnaud Ferraris
2020-07-15 16:22                 ` Mark Brown
2020-07-15 16:32                   ` Arnaud Ferraris
2020-07-15 20:46                 ` Nicolin Chen
2020-07-16  9:54                   ` Arnaud Ferraris
2020-07-15 21:03               ` Nicolin Chen
2020-07-16 12:18                 ` Mark Brown
2020-07-16 14:26                   ` Arnaud Ferraris
2020-07-17 11:16   ` Arnaud Ferraris
2020-07-23  5:46     ` Nicolin Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200714201544.GA10501@Asurada-Nvidia \
    --to=nicoleotsuka@gmail.com \
    --cc=Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=arnaud.ferraris@collabora.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=timur@kernel.org \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox