Re: [PATCH 00/13] Rid W=1 warnings in CPUFreq

Lee Jones
2020-07-15T07:34:17Z

On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Viresh Kumar wrote:

> On 15-07-20, 07:32, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >
> > > On 14-07-20, 15:50, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1
> > > > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with
> > > > niggly little warnings.
> > > >
> > > > After these patches are applied, the build system no longer
> > > > complains about any W=0 nor W=1 level warnings in drivers/cpufreq.
> > >
> > > And you need to rebase this stuff of pm/linux-next, as there are some
> > > changes in cpufreq.c there.
> >
> > It's based on the latest -next. Is pm/linux-next in -next?
>
> Yes it is. Actually my bad, I based it on my next which didn't had
> pm/linux-next :)

No problem.

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog