public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: peterz@infradead.org, acme@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jolsa@kernel.org, eranian@google.com,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V6 11/14] perf/x86/intel: Disable sample-read the slots and metrics events
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 07:05:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200717140554.22863-12-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200717140554.22863-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

Users fail to sample-read the slots and metrics events, e.g.,
perf record -e '{slots, topdown-retiring}:S'.

When reading the metrics event, the fixed counter 3 (slots) has to be
reset, which impacts the sampling of the slots event.

Add a specific validate_group() support to reject the case and error out
for Ice Lake.

An alternative fix may unconditionally disable slots sampling, but it's
not a decent fix. Users may want to only sample the slot events
without the topdown metrics events.

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/core.c       |  4 ++++
 arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/events/perf_event.h |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index c25dde095bca..7a4c26b89cbf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -2176,7 +2176,11 @@ static int validate_group(struct perf_event *event)
 
 	fake_cpuc->n_events = 0;
 	ret = x86_pmu.schedule_events(fake_cpuc, n, NULL);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out;
 
+	if (x86_pmu.validate_group)
+		ret = x86_pmu.validate_group(fake_cpuc, n);
 out:
 	free_fake_cpuc(fake_cpuc);
 	return ret;
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index dd3d9f3f2162..bcd96d7fb6ec 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -4576,6 +4576,25 @@ static __init void intel_ht_bug(void)
 	x86_pmu.stop_scheduling = intel_stop_scheduling;
 }
 
+static int icl_validate_group(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int n)
+{
+	bool has_sampling_slots = false, has_metrics = false;
+	struct perf_event *e;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+		e = cpuc->event_list[i];
+		if (is_slots_event(e) && is_sampling_event(e))
+			has_sampling_slots = true;
+
+		if (is_metric_event(e))
+			has_metrics = true;
+	}
+	if (unlikely(has_sampling_slots && has_metrics))
+		return -EINVAL;
+	return 0;
+}
+
 EVENT_ATTR_STR(mem-loads,	mem_ld_hsw,	"event=0xcd,umask=0x1,ldlat=3");
 EVENT_ATTR_STR(mem-stores,	mem_st_hsw,	"event=0xd0,umask=0x82")
 
@@ -5437,6 +5456,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 		intel_pmu_pebs_data_source_skl(pmem);
 		x86_pmu.update_topdown_event = icl_update_topdown_event;
 		x86_pmu.set_topdown_event_period = icl_set_topdown_event_period;
+		x86_pmu.validate_group = icl_validate_group;
 		pr_cont("Icelake events, ");
 		name = "icelake";
 		break;
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index 8100c21205e8..acd85baeabd8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -677,6 +677,8 @@ struct x86_pmu {
 	int		perfctr_second_write;
 	u64		(*limit_period)(struct perf_event *event, u64 l);
 
+	int		(*validate_group)(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int n);
+
 	/* PMI handler bits */
 	unsigned int	late_ack		:1,
 			enabled_ack		:1,
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-17 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-17 14:05 [PATCH V6 00/14] TopDown metrics support for Icelake kan.liang
2020-07-17 14:05 ` [PATCH V6 01/14] perf/x86: Use event_base_rdpmc for the RDPMC userspace support kan.liang
2020-07-17 14:05 ` [PATCH V6 02/14] perf/x86/intel: Name the global status bit in NMI handler kan.liang
2020-07-17 14:05 ` [PATCH V6 03/14] perf/x86/intel: Introduce the fourth fixed counter kan.liang
2020-07-20 16:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-20 18:22     ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-17 14:05 ` [PATCH V6 04/14] perf/x86/intel: Move BTS index to 47 kan.liang
2020-07-17 14:05 ` [PATCH V6 05/14] perf/x86/intel: Fix the name of perf METRICS kan.liang
2020-07-17 14:05 ` [PATCH V6 06/14] perf/x86/intel: Use switch in intel_pmu_disable/enable_event kan.liang
2020-07-20 16:22   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-20 19:02     ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-17 14:05 ` [PATCH V6 07/14] perf/x86/intel: Generic support for hardware TopDown metrics kan.liang
2020-07-20 17:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-20 18:11     ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-21  9:43   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-21 14:05     ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-21 14:25       ` peterz
2020-07-17 14:05 ` [PATCH V6 08/14] perf/x86: Add a macro for RDPMC offset of fixed counters kan.liang
2020-07-17 14:05 ` [PATCH V6 09/14] perf/x86/intel: Support TopDown metrics on Ice Lake kan.liang
2020-07-21 12:40   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-21 14:23     ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-21 14:31       ` peterz
2020-07-21 15:50         ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-21 17:38     ` Andi Kleen
2020-07-21 19:20       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-17 14:05 ` [PATCH V6 10/14] perf/x86/intel: Support per-thread RDPMC TopDown metrics kan.liang
2020-07-17 14:05 ` kan.liang [this message]
2020-07-21 13:10   ` [PATCH V6 11/14] perf/x86/intel: Disable sample-read the slots and metrics events Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-21 16:07     ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-21 19:18       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-22 19:26     ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-17 14:05 ` [PATCH V6 12/14] perf, tools, stat: Support new per thread TopDown metrics kan.liang
2020-07-17 14:05 ` [PATCH V6 13/14] perf, tools, stat: Check Topdown Metric group kan.liang
2020-07-17 14:05 ` [PATCH V6 14/14] perf, tools: Add documentation for topdown metrics kan.liang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200717140554.22863-12-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox