From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: peterz@infradead.org, acme@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jolsa@kernel.org, eranian@google.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V6 04/14] perf/x86/intel: Move BTS index to 47
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 07:05:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200717140554.22863-5-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200717140554.22863-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
The bit 48 in the PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS is used to indicate the overflow
status of the PERF_METRICS counters.
Move the BTS index to the bit 47.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
index bac6c30c98cb..08e4de8802fe 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -238,11 +238,11 @@ struct x86_pmu_capability {
/*
* We model BTS tracing as another fixed-mode PMC.
*
- * We choose a value in the middle of the fixed event range, since lower
+ * We choose the value 47 for the fixed index of BTS, since lower
* values are used by actual fixed events and higher values are used
* to indicate other overflow conditions in the PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS msr.
*/
-#define INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED_BTS (INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED + 16)
+#define INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED_BTS (INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED + 15)
#define GLOBAL_STATUS_COND_CHG BIT_ULL(63)
#define GLOBAL_STATUS_BUFFER_OVF_BIT 62
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-17 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-17 14:05 [PATCH V6 00/14] TopDown metrics support for Icelake kan.liang
2020-07-17 14:05 ` [PATCH V6 01/14] perf/x86: Use event_base_rdpmc for the RDPMC userspace support kan.liang
2020-07-17 14:05 ` [PATCH V6 02/14] perf/x86/intel: Name the global status bit in NMI handler kan.liang
2020-07-17 14:05 ` [PATCH V6 03/14] perf/x86/intel: Introduce the fourth fixed counter kan.liang
2020-07-20 16:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-20 18:22 ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-17 14:05 ` kan.liang [this message]
2020-07-17 14:05 ` [PATCH V6 05/14] perf/x86/intel: Fix the name of perf METRICS kan.liang
2020-07-17 14:05 ` [PATCH V6 06/14] perf/x86/intel: Use switch in intel_pmu_disable/enable_event kan.liang
2020-07-20 16:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-20 19:02 ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-17 14:05 ` [PATCH V6 07/14] perf/x86/intel: Generic support for hardware TopDown metrics kan.liang
2020-07-20 17:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-20 18:11 ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-21 9:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-21 14:05 ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-21 14:25 ` peterz
2020-07-17 14:05 ` [PATCH V6 08/14] perf/x86: Add a macro for RDPMC offset of fixed counters kan.liang
2020-07-17 14:05 ` [PATCH V6 09/14] perf/x86/intel: Support TopDown metrics on Ice Lake kan.liang
2020-07-21 12:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-21 14:23 ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-21 14:31 ` peterz
2020-07-21 15:50 ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-21 17:38 ` Andi Kleen
2020-07-21 19:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-17 14:05 ` [PATCH V6 10/14] perf/x86/intel: Support per-thread RDPMC TopDown metrics kan.liang
2020-07-17 14:05 ` [PATCH V6 11/14] perf/x86/intel: Disable sample-read the slots and metrics events kan.liang
2020-07-21 13:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-21 16:07 ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-21 19:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-22 19:26 ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-17 14:05 ` [PATCH V6 12/14] perf, tools, stat: Support new per thread TopDown metrics kan.liang
2020-07-17 14:05 ` [PATCH V6 13/14] perf, tools, stat: Check Topdown Metric group kan.liang
2020-07-17 14:05 ` [PATCH V6 14/14] perf, tools: Add documentation for topdown metrics kan.liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200717140554.22863-5-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox