From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
sfr@canb.auug.org.au
Subject: Re: [tip:sched/fifo 44/45] ERROR: modpost: "sched_setscheduler" undefined!
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 09:30:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200721093010.1c8bd787@oasis.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200721083643.GG119549@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 10:36:43 +0200
peterz@infradead.org wrote:
> > Yeah, that's fine. You don't have any sched_fifo_high() ?
>
> Thanks! and no.
>
> I'll go write a Changelog and add it to tip/sched/fifo, so that
> hopefully, sfr can stop complaining about this build fail ;-)
>
> I've even argued we should rename fifo_low() to something else, but
> failed to come up with a sensible name. The intended case is for when
> you want something above normal but don't particularly care about RT at
> all.
>
> The thing is, once you start adding priorities, even low,med,high, we're
> back to where we were. And the whole argument is that the kernel cannot
> set priorities in any sensible fashion.
Actually, I was wondering about a "sched_fifo_benchmark()" used
specifically for internal testing, where you *want* to disrupt the
system. Perhaps have it depend on CONFIG_DEBUG to at least scare
people away from using it for normal production code. Or make it print
a nasty banner like trace_printk() does. That worked pretty well at
keeping people from using it ;-)
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-21 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-19 14:15 [tip:sched/fifo 44/45] ERROR: modpost: "sched_setscheduler" undefined! kernel test robot
2020-07-09 12:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-09 15:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-20 21:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-20 22:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-21 8:36 ` peterz
2020-07-21 10:13 ` Qais Yousef
2020-07-29 10:23 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-07-29 10:38 ` Qais Yousef
2020-07-30 15:29 ` Qais Yousef
2020-07-21 13:30 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2020-07-24 21:39 ` [PATCH] sched,tracing: Convert to sched_set_fifo() peterz
2020-07-24 21:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-24 21:50 ` [PATCH v2] " peterz
2020-07-24 22:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-25 16:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-27 20:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-29 10:54 ` [tip: sched/fifo] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200721093010.1c8bd787@oasis.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox