public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	sfr@canb.auug.org.au
Subject: Re: [tip:sched/fifo 44/45] ERROR: modpost: "sched_setscheduler" undefined!
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 09:30:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200721093010.1c8bd787@oasis.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200721083643.GG119549@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 10:36:43 +0200
peterz@infradead.org wrote:

> > Yeah, that's fine. You don't have any sched_fifo_high() ?  
> 
> Thanks! and no.
> 
> I'll go write a Changelog and add it to tip/sched/fifo, so that
> hopefully, sfr can stop complaining about this build fail ;-)
> 
> I've even argued we should rename fifo_low() to something else, but
> failed to come up with a sensible name. The intended case is for when
> you want something above normal but don't particularly care about RT at
> all.
> 
> The thing is, once you start adding priorities, even low,med,high, we're
> back to where we were. And the whole argument is that the kernel cannot
> set priorities in any sensible fashion.

Actually, I was wondering about a "sched_fifo_benchmark()" used
specifically for internal testing, where you *want* to disrupt the
system. Perhaps have it depend on CONFIG_DEBUG to at least scare
people away from using it for normal production code. Or make it print
a nasty banner like trace_printk() does. That worked pretty well at
keeping people from using it ;-)

-- Steve

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-21 13:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-19 14:15 [tip:sched/fifo 44/45] ERROR: modpost: "sched_setscheduler" undefined! kernel test robot
2020-07-09 12:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-09 15:58   ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-20 21:49     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-20 22:19       ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-21  8:36         ` peterz
2020-07-21 10:13           ` Qais Yousef
2020-07-29 10:23             ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-07-29 10:38               ` Qais Yousef
2020-07-30 15:29               ` Qais Yousef
2020-07-21 13:30           ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2020-07-24 21:39       ` [PATCH] sched,tracing: Convert to sched_set_fifo() peterz
2020-07-24 21:46         ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-24 21:50           ` [PATCH v2] " peterz
2020-07-24 22:18             ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-25 16:58               ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-27 20:56                 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-29 10:54       ` [tip: sched/fifo] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200721093010.1c8bd787@oasis.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox