From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: paulmck@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
mark.rutland@arm.com, dvyukov@google.com, glider@google.com,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] kcsan: Compound read-write instrumentation
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 10:39:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200724083920.GV10769@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200724070008.1389205-1-elver@google.com>
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 09:00:00AM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> Marco Elver (8):
> kcsan: Support compounded read-write instrumentation
> objtool, kcsan: Add __tsan_read_write to uaccess whitelist
> kcsan: Skew delay to be longer for certain access types
> kcsan: Add missing CONFIG_KCSAN_IGNORE_ATOMICS checks
> kcsan: Test support for compound instrumentation
> instrumented.h: Introduce read-write instrumentation hooks
> asm-generic/bitops: Use instrument_read_write() where appropriate
> locking/atomics: Use read-write instrumentation for atomic RMWs
Looks good to me,
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-24 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-24 7:00 [PATCH v2 0/8] kcsan: Compound read-write instrumentation Marco Elver
2020-07-24 7:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] kcsan: Support compounded " Marco Elver
2020-07-24 7:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] objtool, kcsan: Add __tsan_read_write to uaccess whitelist Marco Elver
2020-07-24 7:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] kcsan: Skew delay to be longer for certain access types Marco Elver
2020-07-24 7:00 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] kcsan: Add missing CONFIG_KCSAN_IGNORE_ATOMICS checks Marco Elver
2020-07-24 7:00 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] kcsan: Test support for compound instrumentation Marco Elver
2020-07-24 7:00 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] instrumented.h: Introduce read-write instrumentation hooks Marco Elver
2020-07-24 7:00 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] asm-generic/bitops: Use instrument_read_write() where appropriate Marco Elver
2020-07-24 7:00 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] locking/atomics: Use read-write instrumentation for atomic RMWs Marco Elver
2020-07-24 8:39 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-07-24 22:40 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] kcsan: Compound read-write instrumentation Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200724083920.GV10769@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox