From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: "Andres Beltran" <lkmlabelt@gmail.com>
Cc: "KY Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
"Haiyang Zhang" <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
"Stephen Hemminger" <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
<wei.liu@kernel.org>, <linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Michael Kelley" <mikelley@microsoft.com>,
<parri.andrea@gmail.com>,
"Saruhan Karademir" <skarade@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Fix variable assignments in hv_ringbuffer_read()
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 10:10:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200724101047.34de7e49@hermes.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200724164606.43699-1-lkmlabelt@gmail.com>
On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 09:46:06 -0700
"Andres Beltran" <lkmlabelt@gmail.com> wrote:
> Assignments to buffer_actual_len and requestid happen before packetlen
> is checked to be within buflen. If this condition is true,
> hv_ringbuffer_read() returns with these variables already set to some
> value even though no data is actually read. This might create
> inconsistencies in any routine calling hv_ringbuffer_read(). Assign values
> to such pointers after the packetlen check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andres Beltran <lkmlabelt@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/hv/ring_buffer.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hv/ring_buffer.c b/drivers/hv/ring_buffer.c
> index 356e22159e83..e277ce7372a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/hv/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/hv/ring_buffer.c
> @@ -350,12 +350,13 @@ int hv_ringbuffer_read(struct vmbus_channel
> *channel,
>
> offset = raw ? 0 : (desc->offset8 << 3);
> packetlen = (desc->len8 << 3) - offset;
> - *buffer_actual_len = packetlen;
> - *requestid = desc->trans_id;
>
> if (unlikely(packetlen > buflen))
> return -ENOBUFS;
>
> + *buffer_actual_len = packetlen;
> + *requestid = desc->trans_id;
> +
> /* since ring is double mapped, only one copy is necessary */
> memcpy(buffer, (const char *)desc + offset, packetlen);
>
What is the rationale for this change, it may break other code.
A common API model in Windows world where this originated
is to have a call where caller first
makes request and then if the requested buffer is not big enough the
caller look at the actual length and allocate a bigger buffer.
Did you audit all the users of this API to make sure they aren't doing that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-24 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-24 16:46 [PATCH] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Fix variable assignments in hv_ringbuffer_read() Andres Beltran
2020-07-24 17:10 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2020-07-24 17:48 ` Haiyang Zhang
2020-07-24 23:04 ` Andres Beltran
2020-07-26 23:53 ` Haiyang Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200724101047.34de7e49@hermes.lan \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkmlabelt@gmail.com \
--cc=mikelley@microsoft.com \
--cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=skarade@microsoft.com \
--cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox