From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@intel.com>
Cc: <bhelgaas@google.com>, <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
<ashok.raj@kernel.org>, <tony.luck@intel.com>,
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/9] PCI: Add 'rcec' field to pci_dev for associated RCiEPs
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 12:23:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200727122358.00006c23@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200724172223.145608-7-sean.v.kelley@intel.com>
On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 10:22:20 -0700
Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@intel.com> wrote:
> From: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
>
> When attempting error recovery for an RCiEP associated with an RCEC device,
> there needs to be a way to update the Root Error Status, the Uncorrectable
> Error Status and the Uncorrectable Error Severity of the parent RCEC.
> So add the 'rcec' field to the pci_dev structure and provide a hook for the
> Root Port Driver to associate RCiEPs with their respective parent RCEC.
>
> Co-developed-by: Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@intel.com>
I haven't tested yet, but I think there is one path in here that breaks
my case (no OS visible rcec / all done in firmware GHESv2 / APEI)
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 9 +++++----
> drivers/pci/pcie/err.c | 9 +++++++++
> drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> include/linux/pci.h | 3 +++
> 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> index 3acf56683915..f1bf06be449e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> @@ -1335,17 +1335,18 @@ static int aer_probe(struct pcie_device *dev)
> static pci_ers_result_t aer_root_reset(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> int aer = dev->aer_cap;
> + int rc = 0;
> u32 reg32;
> - int rc;
> -
>
> /* Disable Root's interrupt in response to error messages */
> pci_read_config_dword(dev, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND, ®32);
> reg32 &= ~ROOT_PORT_INTR_ON_MESG_MASK;
> pci_write_config_dword(dev, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND, reg32);
>
> - rc = pci_bus_error_reset(dev);
> - pci_info(dev, "Root Port link has been reset\n");
> + if (pci_pcie_type(dev) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC) {
> + rc = pci_bus_error_reset(dev);
> + pci_info(dev, "Root Port link has been reset\n");
> + }
>
> /* Clear Root Error Status */
> pci_read_config_dword(dev, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS, ®32);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> index 9b3ec94bdf1d..0aae7643132e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> @@ -203,6 +203,11 @@ pci_ers_result_t pcie_do_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev,
> pci_walk_dev_affected(dev, report_frozen_detected, &status);
> if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END) {
> status = flr_on_rciep(dev);
> + /*
> + * The callback only clears the Root Error Status
> + * of the RCEC (see aer.c).
> + */
> + reset_link(dev->rcec);
This looks dangerous for my case where APEI / GHESv2 is used. In that case
we don't expose an RCEC at all. I don't think the reset_link callback
is safe to a null pointer here. Fix may be as simple as
if (dev->rcec)
reset_link(dev->rcec);
> if (status != PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED) {
> pci_warn(dev, "function level reset failed\n");
> goto failed;
> @@ -246,7 +251,11 @@ pci_ers_result_t pcie_do_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev,
> pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC)) {
> pci_aer_clear_device_status(dev);
> pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status(dev);
> + } else if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END) {
> + pci_aer_clear_device_status(dev->rcec);
> + pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status(dev->rcec);
These may be safe as in my both now have protections for !pcie_aer_is_native.
> }
> +
> pci_info(dev, "device recovery successful\n");
> return status;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
> index d5b109499b10..f9409a0110c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
> @@ -90,6 +90,18 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops pcie_portdrv_pm_ops = {
> #define PCIE_PORTDRV_PM_OPS NULL
> #endif /* !PM */
>
> +static int pcie_hook_rcec(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *rcec = (struct pci_dev *)data;
> +
> + pdev->rcec = rcec;
> + pci_info(rcec, "RCiEP(under an RCEC) %04x:%02x:%02x.%d\n",
> + pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus), pdev->bus->number,
> + PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn), PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn));
We may want to make this debug info at somepoint if we have a way
of discovering it from userspace. The PCI boot up is extremely
verbose already!
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * pcie_portdrv_probe - Probe PCI-Express port devices
> * @dev: PCI-Express port device being probed
> @@ -110,6 +122,9 @@ static int pcie_portdrv_probe(struct pci_dev *dev,
> (pci_pcie_type(dev) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC)))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> + if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC)
> + pcie_walk_rcec(dev, pcie_hook_rcec, dev);
> +
> status = pcie_port_device_register(dev);
> if (status)
> return status;
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index 34c1c4f45288..e920f29df40b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -326,6 +326,9 @@ struct pci_dev {
> #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEAER
> u16 aer_cap; /* AER capability offset */
> struct aer_stats *aer_stats; /* AER stats for this device */
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCIEPORTBUS
> + struct pci_dev *rcec; /* Associated RCEC device */
> #endif
> u8 pcie_cap; /* PCIe capability offset */
> u8 msi_cap; /* MSI capability offset */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-27 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-24 17:22 [RFC PATCH 0/9] Add RCEC handling to PCI/AER Sean V Kelley
2020-07-24 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] pci_ids: Add class code and extended capability for RCEC Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 10:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 10:21 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 15:22 ` Sean V Kelley
2020-07-24 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] PCI: Extend Root Port Driver to support RCEC Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 12:30 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 15:05 ` Sean V Kelley
2020-07-24 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] PCI/portdrv: Add pcie_walk_rcec() to walk RCiEPs associated with RCEC Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 10:49 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 15:21 ` Sean V Kelley
2020-07-24 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] PCI/AER: Extend AER error handling to RCECs Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 11:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 14:58 ` Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 14:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 15:00 ` Sean V Kelley
2020-07-24 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] PCI/AER: Apply function level reset to RCiEP on fatal error Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 11:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-28 13:27 ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2020-07-28 16:14 ` Sean V Kelley
2020-07-28 17:02 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-28 17:42 ` Sean V Kelley
2020-07-24 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] PCI: Add 'rcec' field to pci_dev for associated RCiEPs Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 11:23 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2020-07-27 15:39 ` Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 16:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 16:28 ` Sean V Kelley
2020-07-24 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] PCI/AER: Add RCEC AER handling Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 12:22 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 15:19 ` Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 17:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-24 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] PCI/PME: Add RCEC PME handling Sean V Kelley
2020-08-04 8:35 ` Jay Fang
2020-08-04 9:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-24 17:22 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] PCI/AER: Add RCEC AER error injection support Sean V Kelley
2020-07-27 12:37 ` [RFC PATCH 0/9] Add RCEC handling to PCI/AER Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-27 14:56 ` Sean V Kelley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200727122358.00006c23@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sean.v.kelley@intel.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).