From: peterz@infradead.org
To: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
lukasz.luba@arm.com, valentin.schneider@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: provide u64 read for 32-bits arch helper
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 13:13:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200728111302.GV119549@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200727152303.GA301827@e120877-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 04:23:03PM +0100, Vincent Donnefort wrote:
> For 32-bit architectures, both min_vruntime and last_update_time are using
> similar access. This patch is simply an attempt to unify their usage by
> introducing two macros to rely on when accessing those. At the same time, it
> brings a comment regarding the barriers usage, as per the kernel policy. So
> overall this is just a clean-up without any functional changes.
Ah, I though there was perhaps the idea to make use of armv7-lpae
instructions.
Aside of that, I think we need to spend a little time bike-shedding the
API/naming here:
> +# define u64_32read(val, copy) (val)
> +# define u64_32read_set_copy(val, copy) do { } while (0)
How about something like:
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
#define DEFINE_U64_U32(name) u64 name
#define u64_u32_load(name) name
#define u64_u32_store(name, val)name = val
#else
#define DEFINE_U64_U32(name) \
struct { \
u64 name; \
u64 name##_copy; \
}
#define u64_u32_load(name) \
({ \
u64 val, copy; \
do { \
val = name; \
smb_rmb(); \
copy = name##_copy; \
} while (val != copy); \
val;
})
#define u64_u32_store(name, val) \
do { \
typeof(val) __val = (val); \
name = __val; \
smp_wmb(); \
name##_copy = __val; \
} while (0)
#endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-28 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-27 10:59 [PATCH] sched/fair: provide u64 read for 32-bits arch helper vincent.donnefort
2020-07-27 11:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2020-07-27 12:05 ` Vincent Donnefort
2020-07-27 12:38 ` peterz
2020-07-27 15:23 ` Vincent Donnefort
2020-07-28 11:13 ` peterz [this message]
2020-07-28 12:00 ` peterz
2020-07-28 19:53 ` Vincent Donnefort
2020-08-18 18:11 ` Vincent Donnefort
2020-07-28 9:09 ` Lukasz Luba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200728111302.GV119549@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.donnefort@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox