From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Julien Thierry <jthierry@redhat.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mbenes@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] objtool: Move orc outside of check
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:15:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200730141526.lr33zv4ffa3rdygp@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3af41a3b-a4b9-8120-3ac0-c9ce13770628@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 02:29:20PM +0100, Julien Thierry wrote:
>
>
> On 7/30/20 2:22 PM, peterz@infradead.org wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 01:40:42PM +0100, Julien Thierry wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/30/20 10:57 AM, peterz@infradead.org wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:41:41AM +0100, Julien Thierry wrote:
> > > > > + if (file->elf->changed)
> > > > > + return elf_write(file->elf);
> > > > > + else
> > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > }
> > > >
> > > > I think we can do without that else :-)
> > > >
> > >
> > > I did wonder and was not 100% confident about it, but the orc gen will
> > > always change the file, correct?
> >
> > Not if it already has orc, iirc.
> >
> > But what I was trying to say is that:
> >
> > if (file->elf->changed)
> > return elf_write(file->elf)
> >
> > return 0;
> >
> > is identical code and, IMO, easier to read.
> >
>
> Much easier yes, I'll change it.
But I think file->elf->changed can be assumed at this point anyway, so
it could just be an unconditional
return elf_write(file->elf);
--
Josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-30 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-30 9:41 [PATCH v3 0/4] Remove dependency of check subcmd upon orc Julien Thierry
2020-07-30 9:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] objtool: Move object file loading out of check Julien Thierry
2020-07-30 14:09 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-07-30 14:42 ` Julien Thierry
2020-07-30 9:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] objtool: Move orc outside " Julien Thierry
2020-07-30 9:57 ` peterz
2020-07-30 12:40 ` Julien Thierry
2020-07-30 13:22 ` peterz
2020-07-30 13:29 ` Julien Thierry
2020-07-30 14:15 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2020-07-30 14:44 ` Julien Thierry
2020-07-31 7:56 ` Miroslav Benes
2020-07-31 8:19 ` Julien Thierry
2020-07-30 9:41 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] objtool: orc: Skip setting orc_entry for non-text sections Julien Thierry
2020-07-30 9:41 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] objtool: orc_gen: Move orc_entry out of instruction structure Julien Thierry
2020-07-30 10:03 ` peterz
2020-07-30 12:40 ` Julien Thierry
2020-07-30 13:33 ` peterz
2020-07-30 13:45 ` Julien Thierry
2020-07-30 14:28 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-07-30 14:06 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Remove dependency of check subcmd upon orc Josh Poimboeuf
2020-07-30 14:42 ` Julien Thierry
2020-07-30 15:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200730141526.lr33zv4ffa3rdygp@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=jthierry@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox