Re: [PATCH 2/5] dmaengine: dw: Activate FIFO-mode for memory peripherals only

Serge Semin
2020-07-30T16:32:02Z

On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 07:24:28PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 06:45:42PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > CFGx.FIFO_MODE field controls a DMA-controller "FIFO readiness" criterion.
> > In other words it determines when to start pushing data out of a DW
> > DMAC channel FIFO to a destination peripheral or from a source
> > peripheral to the DW DMAC channel FIFO. Currently FIFO-mode is set to one
> > for all DW DMAC channels. It means they are tuned to flush data out of
> > FIFO (to a memory peripheral or by accepting the burst transaction
> > requests) when FIFO is at least half-full (except at the end of the block
> > transfer, when FIFO-flush mode is activated) and are configured to get
> > data to the FIFO when it's at least half-empty.
> >
> > Such configuration is a good choice when there is no slave device involved
> > in the DMA transfers. In that case the number of bursts per block is less
> > than when CFGx.FIFO_MODE = 0 and, hence, the bus utilization will improve.
> > But the latency of DMA transfers may increase when CFGx.FIFO_MODE = 1,
> > since DW DMAC will wait for the channel FIFO contents to be either
> > half-full or half-empty depending on having the destination or the source
> > transfers. Such latencies might be dangerous in case if the DMA transfers
> > are expected to be performed from/to a slave device. Since normally
> > peripheral devices keep data in internal FIFOs, any latency at some
> > critical moment may cause one being overflown and consequently losing
> > data. This especially concerns a case when either a peripheral device is
> > relatively fast or the DW DMAC engine is relatively slow with respect to
> > the incoming data pace.
> >
> > In order to solve problems, which might be caused by the latencies
> > described above, let's enable the FIFO half-full/half-empty "FIFO
> > readiness" criterion only for DMA transfers with no slave device involved.
>
> > Thanks to the commit ???????????? ("dmaengine: dw: Initialize channel
>
> See below.
>
> > before each transfer") we can freely do that in the generic
> > dw_dma_initialize_chan() method.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> Thanks!
>
> > Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Note the DMA-engine repository git.infradead.org/users/vkoul/slave-dma.git
> > isn't accessible. So I couldn't find out the Andy' commit hash to use it in
> > the log.
>

> It's dmaengine.git on git.kernel.org.

Ah, thanks! I've just found out that the repo address has been changed. But I've
also scanned the "next" branch of the repo:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vkoul/dmaengine.git

Your commit isn't there. Am I missing something?

-Sergey

>
> > ---
> > drivers/dma/dw/dw.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw/dw.c b/drivers/dma/dw/dw.c
> > index 7a085b3c1854..d9810980920a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma/dw/dw.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma/dw/dw.c
> > @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
> > static void dw_dma_initialize_chan(struct dw_dma_chan *dwc)
> > {
> > struct dw_dma *dw = to_dw_dma(dwc->chan.device);
> > - u32 cfghi = DWC_CFGH_FIFO_MODE;
> > + u32 cfghi = is_slave_direction(dwc->direction) ? 0 : DWC_CFGH_FIFO_MODE;
> > u32 cfglo = DWC_CFGL_CH_PRIOR(dwc->priority);
> > bool hs_polarity = dwc->dws.hs_polarity;
> >
> > --
> > 2.27.0
> >
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>