public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: John Donnelly <john.p.donnelly@oracle.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [(resend) PATCH v3: {linux-4.14.y} ] dm cache: submit writethrough writes in parallel to origin and cache
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 14:20:38 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200804182037.GA15453@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200804124735.GA219143@kroah.com>

On Tue, Aug 04 2020 at  8:47am -0400,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 07:33:05AM -0500, John Donnelly wrote:
> > From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Discontinue issuing writethrough write IO in series to the origin and
> > then cache.
> > 
> > Use bio_clone_fast() to create a new origin clone bio that will be
> > mapped to the origin device and then bio_chain() it to the bio that gets
> > remapped to the cache device.  The origin clone bio does _not_ have a
> > copy of the per_bio_data -- as such check_if_tick_bio_needed() will not
> > be called.
> > 
> > The cache bio (parent bio) will not complete until the origin bio has
> > completed -- this fulfills bio_clone_fast()'s requirements as well as
> > the requirement to not complete the original IO until the write IO has
> > completed to both the origin and cache device.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
> > 
> > (cherry picked from commit 2df3bae9a6543e90042291707b8db0cbfbae9ee9)
> > 
> > Fixes: 4ec34f2196d125ff781170ddc6c3058c08ec5e73 (dm bio record:
> > save/restore bi_end_io and bi_integrity )
> > 
> > 4ec34f21 introduced a mkfs.ext4 hang on a LVM device that has been
> > modified with lvconvert --cachemode=writethrough.
> > 
> > CC:stable@vger.kernel.org for 4.14.y
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: John Donnelly <john.p.donnelly@oracle.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Somasundaram Krishnasamy <somasundaram.krishnasamy@oracle.com>
> > 
> > conflicts:
> > 	drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c. -  Corrected usage of
> > 	writethrough_mode(&cache->feature) that was caught by
> > 	compiler, and removed unused static functions : writethrough_endio(),
> > 	defer_writethrough_bio(), wake_deferred_writethrough_worker()
> > 	that generated warnings.
> 
> What is this "conflicts nonsense"?  You don't see that in any other
> kernel patch changelog, do you?
> 
> > ---
> > drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
> 
> Please fix your email client up, it's totally broken and this does not
> work at all and is getting frustrating from my side here.
> 
> Try sending emails to yourself and see if you can apply the patches, as
> the one you sent here does not work, again:

John's inability to submit a patch that can apply aside: I do not like
how this patch header is constructed (yet attributed "From" me).  It is
devoid of detail as it relates to stable@.

Greg, please don't apply the v4 of this patch either.  I'll craft a
proper stable@ patch that explains the reason for change and why we're
left having to resolve conflicts in stable@.

But first I need to focus on sending DM changes to Linus for v5.9 merge.

Thanks,
Mike


  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-04 18:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-04 12:33 [(resend) PATCH v3: {linux-4.14.y} ] dm cache: submit writethrough writes in parallel to origin and cache John Donnelly
2020-08-04 12:47 ` Greg KH
2020-08-04 18:20   ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2020-08-05 14:32     ` Greg KH
2020-08-05 19:34       ` fixing 4.14-stable's broken DM cache writethrough support [was: Re: [(resend) PATCH v3: {linux-4.14.y} ] dm cache: submit writethrough writes in parallel to origin and cache] Mike Snitzer
2020-08-20  8:18         ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200804182037.GA15453@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=john.p.donnelly@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox