public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	morten.rasmussen@arm.com, Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/10] sched/topology: Define and assign sched_domain flag metadata
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 16:07:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200806140750.GC2077896@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200731115502.12954-6-valentin.schneider@arm.com>


* Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> wrote:

> +#ifndef SD_FLAG
> +#define SD_FLAG(x, y, z)
> +#endif

AFAICS there's not a single use of sd_flags.h that doesn't come with 
its own SD_FLAG definition, so I suppose this should be:

#ifndef SD_FLAG
# error "Should not happen."
#endif

?

Also, some nits:

> +/*
> + * Expected flag uses
> + *
> + * SHARED_CHILD: These flags are meant to be set from the base domain upwards.
> + * If a domain has this flag set, all of its children should have it set. This
> + * is usually because the flag describes some shared resource (all CPUs in that
> + * domain share the same foobar), or because they are tied to a scheduling
> + * behaviour that we want to disable at some point in the hierarchy for
> + * scalability reasons.

s/foobar/resource

?

> +/*
> + * cross-node balancing
> + *
> + * SHARED_PARENT: Set for all NUMA levels above NODE.
> + */
> +SD_FLAG(SD_NUMA,                12, SDF_SHARED_PARENT)

s/cross-node/Cross-node

BTW., is there any particular reason why these need to be defines with 
a manual enumeration of flag values - couldn't we generate 
auto-enumerated C enums instead or so?

> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
> +#define SD_FLAG(_name, idx, mflags) [idx] = {.meta_flags = mflags, .name = #_name},

s/{./{ .
s/e}/e }

Thanks,

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-06 17:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-31 11:54 [PATCH v4 00/10] sched: Instrument sched domain flags Valentin Schneider
2020-07-31 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] ARM, sched/topology: Remove SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN Valentin Schneider
2020-07-31 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] ARM: Revert back to default scheduler topology Valentin Schneider
2020-07-31 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] sched/topology: Propagate SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY upwards Valentin Schneider
2020-08-06 14:20   ` Ingo Molnar
2020-08-06 16:19     ` Valentin Schneider
2020-08-06 16:46       ` Ingo Molnar
2020-07-31 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] sched/topology: Split out SD_* flags declaration to its own file Valentin Schneider
2020-07-31 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] sched/topology: Define and assign sched_domain flag metadata Valentin Schneider
2020-08-04 11:08   ` peterz
2020-08-04 11:12     ` Valentin Schneider
2020-08-06 14:07   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2020-08-06 16:18     ` Valentin Schneider
2020-08-08  0:19       ` Valentin Schneider
2020-07-31 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] sched/topology: Verify SD_* flags setup when sched_debug is on Valentin Schneider
2020-07-31 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] sched/topology: Add more flags to the SD degeneration mask Valentin Schneider
2020-08-06 13:57   ` Ingo Molnar
2020-07-31 11:55 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] sched/topology: Remove SD_SERIALIZE degeneration special case Valentin Schneider
2020-07-31 11:55 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] sched/topology: Introduce SD metaflag for flags needing > 1 groups Valentin Schneider
2020-07-31 11:55 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] sched/topology: Use prebuilt SD flag degeneration mask Valentin Schneider
2020-08-06 11:25 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] sched: Instrument sched domain flags Dietmar Eggemann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200806140750.GC2077896@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox