From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
peterz@infradead.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/10] sched/topology: Propagate SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY upwards
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 18:46:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200806164628.GA2137558@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jhj5z9viw6p.mognet@arm.com>
* Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> wrote:
> This does sound sensible; I can shuffle this around for v5.
Thanks!
> FWIW the reason I had this very patch before the instrumentation is that
> IMO it really wants to be propagated and could thus directly be tagged with
> SDF_SHARED_PARENT when the instrumentation hits. It's a minor thing, but
> having it after the instrumentation means that I'll first have to tag it
> without any hierarchical metaflag, and then tag it with SDF_SHARED_PARENT
> in the propagation fix.
>
> If that sounds fine by you, I'll do just that.
Sounds good to me!
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-06 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-31 11:54 [PATCH v4 00/10] sched: Instrument sched domain flags Valentin Schneider
2020-07-31 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] ARM, sched/topology: Remove SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN Valentin Schneider
2020-07-31 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] ARM: Revert back to default scheduler topology Valentin Schneider
2020-07-31 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] sched/topology: Propagate SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY upwards Valentin Schneider
2020-08-06 14:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2020-08-06 16:19 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-08-06 16:46 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2020-07-31 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] sched/topology: Split out SD_* flags declaration to its own file Valentin Schneider
2020-07-31 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] sched/topology: Define and assign sched_domain flag metadata Valentin Schneider
2020-08-04 11:08 ` peterz
2020-08-04 11:12 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-08-06 14:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2020-08-06 16:18 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-08-08 0:19 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-07-31 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] sched/topology: Verify SD_* flags setup when sched_debug is on Valentin Schneider
2020-07-31 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] sched/topology: Add more flags to the SD degeneration mask Valentin Schneider
2020-08-06 13:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2020-07-31 11:55 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] sched/topology: Remove SD_SERIALIZE degeneration special case Valentin Schneider
2020-07-31 11:55 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] sched/topology: Introduce SD metaflag for flags needing > 1 groups Valentin Schneider
2020-07-31 11:55 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] sched/topology: Use prebuilt SD flag degeneration mask Valentin Schneider
2020-08-06 11:25 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] sched: Instrument sched domain flags Dietmar Eggemann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200806164628.GA2137558@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox