public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Oskolkov <posk@google.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
	Chris Kennelly <ckennelly@google.com>,
	Peter Oskolkov <posk@posk.io>, Peter Oskolkov <posk@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2 v2] rseq/selftests: test MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_RESTART_RSEQ_ON_CPU
Date: Thu,  6 Aug 2020 10:05:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200806170544.382140-2-posk@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200806170544.382140-1-posk@google.com>

Based on Google-internal RSEQ work done by
Paul Turner and Andrew Hunter.

This patch adds a selftest for MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_RESTART_RSEQ_ON_CPU.
The test quite often fails without the previous patch in this patchset,
but consistently passes with it.

Signed-off-by: Peter Oskolkov <posk@google.com>
---
 .../selftests/rseq/basic_percpu_ops_test.c    | 181 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 181 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/basic_percpu_ops_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/basic_percpu_ops_test.c
index eb3f6db36d36..147c80deac19 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/basic_percpu_ops_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/basic_percpu_ops_test.c
@@ -3,16 +3,21 @@
 #include <assert.h>
 #include <pthread.h>
 #include <sched.h>
+#include <stdatomic.h>
 #include <stdint.h>
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <string.h>
 #include <stddef.h>
+#include <syscall.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
 
 #include "rseq.h"
 
 #define ARRAY_SIZE(arr)	(sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]))
 
+#define MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_RESTART_RSEQ_ON_CPU	(1<<7)
+
 struct percpu_lock_entry {
 	intptr_t v;
 } __attribute__((aligned(128)));
@@ -289,6 +294,180 @@ void test_percpu_list(void)
 	assert(sum == expected_sum);
 }
 
+struct test_membarrier_thread_args {
+	int stop;
+	intptr_t percpu_list_ptr;
+};
+
+/* Worker threads modify data in their "active" percpu lists. */
+void *test_membarrier_worker_thread(void *arg)
+{
+	struct test_membarrier_thread_args *args =
+		(struct test_membarrier_thread_args *)arg;
+	const int iters = 10 * 1000 * 1000;
+	int i;
+
+	if (rseq_register_current_thread()) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "Error: rseq_register_current_thread(...) failed(%d): %s\n",
+			errno, strerror(errno));
+		abort();
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < iters; ++i) {
+		while (true) {
+			int cpu, ret;
+			struct percpu_list *list_ptr = (struct percpu_list *)
+				atomic_load(&args->percpu_list_ptr);
+
+			if (!list_ptr)
+				continue;  /* Not yet initialized. */
+
+			cpu = rseq_cpu_start();
+			struct percpu_list_node *node = list_ptr->c[cpu].head;
+			const intptr_t prev = node->data;
+
+			ret = rseq_cmpeqv_cmpeqv_storev(&node->data, prev,
+					&args->percpu_list_ptr,
+					(intptr_t)list_ptr, prev + 1, cpu);
+			if (!ret)
+				break;  /* Success. */
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (rseq_unregister_current_thread()) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "Error: rseq_unregister_current_thread(...) failed(%d): %s\n",
+			errno, strerror(errno));
+		abort();
+	}
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+void test_membarrier_init_percpu_list(struct percpu_list *list)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	memset(list, 0, sizeof(*list));
+	for (i = 0; i < CPU_SETSIZE; i++) {
+		struct percpu_list_node *node;
+
+		node = malloc(sizeof(*node));
+		assert(node);
+		node->data = 0;
+		node->next = NULL;
+		list->c[i].head = node;
+	}
+}
+
+void test_membarrier_free_percpu_list(struct percpu_list *list)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < CPU_SETSIZE; i++)
+		free(list->c[i].head);
+}
+
+static int sys_membarrier(int cmd, int flags)
+{
+	return syscall(__NR_membarrier, cmd, flags);
+}
+
+/*
+ * The manager thread swaps per-cpu lists that worker threads see,
+ * and validates that there are no unexpected modifications.
+ */
+void *test_membarrier_manager_thread(void *arg)
+{
+	struct test_membarrier_thread_args *args =
+		(struct test_membarrier_thread_args *)arg;
+	struct percpu_list list_a, list_b;
+	intptr_t expect_a = 0, expect_b = 0;
+	int cpu_a = 0, cpu_b = 0;
+
+	if (rseq_register_current_thread()) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "Error: rseq_register_current_thread(...) failed(%d): %s\n",
+			errno, strerror(errno));
+		abort();
+	}
+
+	/* Init lists. */
+	test_membarrier_init_percpu_list(&list_a);
+	test_membarrier_init_percpu_list(&list_b);
+
+	atomic_store(&args->percpu_list_ptr, (intptr_t)&list_a);
+
+	while (!atomic_load(&args->stop)) {
+		/* list_a is "active". */
+		cpu_a = rand() % CPU_SETSIZE;
+		/*
+		 * As list_b is "inactive", we should never see changes
+		 * to list_b.
+		 */
+		if (expect_b != atomic_load(&list_b.c[cpu_b].head->data)) {
+			fprintf(stderr, "Membarrier test failed\n");
+			abort();
+		}
+
+		/* Make list_b "active". */
+		atomic_store(&args->percpu_list_ptr, (intptr_t)&list_b);
+		sys_membarrier(MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_RESTART_RSEQ_ON_CPU, cpu_a);
+		/*
+		 * Cpu A should now only modify list_b, so we values
+		 * in list_a should be stable.
+		 */
+		expect_a = atomic_load(&list_a.c[cpu_a].head->data);
+
+		cpu_b = rand() % CPU_SETSIZE;
+		/*
+		 * As list_a is "inactive", we should never see changes
+		 * to list_a.
+		 */
+		if (expect_a != atomic_load(&list_a.c[cpu_a].head->data)) {
+			fprintf(stderr, "Membarrier test failed\n");
+			abort();
+		}
+
+		/* Make list_a "active". */
+		atomic_store(&args->percpu_list_ptr, (intptr_t)&list_a);
+		sys_membarrier(MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_RESTART_RSEQ_ON_CPU, cpu_b);
+		/* Remember a value from list_b. */
+		expect_b = atomic_load(&list_b.c[cpu_b].head->data);
+	}
+
+	test_membarrier_free_percpu_list(&list_a);
+	test_membarrier_free_percpu_list(&list_b);
+
+	if (rseq_unregister_current_thread()) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "Error: rseq_unregister_current_thread(...) failed(%d): %s\n",
+			errno, strerror(errno));
+		abort();
+	}
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+/* Test MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_RESTART_RSEQ_ON_CPU membarrier command. */
+void test_membarrier(void)
+{
+	struct test_membarrier_thread_args thread_args;
+	pthread_t worker_threads[CPU_SETSIZE];
+	pthread_t manager_thread;
+	int i;
+
+	thread_args.stop = 0;
+	thread_args.percpu_list_ptr = 0;
+	pthread_create(&manager_thread, NULL,
+		       test_membarrier_manager_thread, &thread_args);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < CPU_SETSIZE; i++)
+		pthread_create(&worker_threads[i], NULL,
+		       test_membarrier_worker_thread, &thread_args);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < CPU_SETSIZE; i++)
+		pthread_join(worker_threads[i], NULL);
+
+	atomic_store(&thread_args.stop, 1);
+	pthread_join(manager_thread, NULL);
+}
+
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
 	if (rseq_register_current_thread()) {
@@ -300,6 +479,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 	test_percpu_spinlock();
 	printf("percpu_list\n");
 	test_percpu_list();
+	printf("membarrier\n");
+	test_membarrier();
 	if (rseq_unregister_current_thread()) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "Error: rseq_unregister_current_thread(...) failed(%d): %s\n",
 			errno, strerror(errno));
-- 
2.28.0.163.g6104cc2f0b6-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-06 17:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-06 17:05 [PATCH 1/2 v2] rseq/membarrier: add MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_RESTART_RSEQ_ON_CPU Peter Oskolkov
2020-08-06 17:05 ` Peter Oskolkov [this message]
2020-08-07  0:27   ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] rseq/selftests: test MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_RESTART_RSEQ_ON_CPU Boqun Feng
2020-08-07 12:54     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-08-07 17:55     ` Peter Oskolkov
2020-08-07 18:25       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-08-07 18:47         ` Peter Oskolkov
2020-08-07 20:29           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-08-07 13:37 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] rseq/membarrier: add MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_RESTART_RSEQ_ON_CPU peterz
2020-08-07 17:50   ` Peter Oskolkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200806170544.382140-2-posk@google.com \
    --to=posk@google.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=ckennelly@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=posk@posk.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox