From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
acme@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
jolsa@redhat.com, eranian@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 01/16] perf/core: Add PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_PAGE_SIZE
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 00:47:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200810224734.GO3982@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <298cfc4d-4a9b-7886-1006-09f2bc24d789@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 06:38:35PM -0400, Liang, Kan wrote:
> On 8/10/2020 5:47 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > It's probably best if we very carefully define up front what is getting
> > reported here. For instance, I believe we already have some fun cases
> > with huge tmpfs where a compound page is mapped with 4k PTEs. Kirill
> > also found a few drivers doing this as well. I think there were also
> > some weird cases for ARM hugetlbfs where there were multiple hardware
> > page table entries mapping a single hugetlbfs page. These would be
> > cases where compound_head() size would be greater than the size of the
> > leaf paging structure entry.
> >
> > This is also why we have KerelPageSize and MMUPageSize in /proc/$pid/smaps.
> >
> > So, is this returning the kernel software page size or the MMU size?
> >
>
> This tries to return the kernel software page size. I will add a commit to
> the function. For the above cases, I think they can be detected by
> PageCompound(page). The current code should already cover them. Is my
> understanding correct?
But the rationale for the whole feature was to measure and possibly
drive large page promotion/demotion, which requires the mmu page-size.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-10 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-10 21:24 [PATCH V6 00/16] Add the page size in the perf record Kan Liang
2020-08-10 21:24 ` [PATCH V6 01/16] perf/core: Add PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_PAGE_SIZE Kan Liang
2020-08-10 21:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-10 21:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-10 22:36 ` Liang, Kan
2020-08-10 21:47 ` Dave Hansen
2020-08-10 22:38 ` Liang, Kan
2020-08-10 22:47 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-08-12 13:39 ` Liang, Kan
2020-08-12 13:53 ` Dave Hansen
2020-08-10 21:24 ` [PATCH V6 02/16] perf/x86/intel: Support PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_PAGE_SIZE Kan Liang
2020-08-10 21:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-10 22:36 ` Liang, Kan
2020-08-10 21:24 ` [PATCH V6 03/16] perf/core: Add support for PERF_SAMPLE_CODE_PAGE_SIZE Kan Liang
2020-08-10 21:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-10 22:37 ` Liang, Kan
2020-08-10 22:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-10 21:24 ` [PATCH V6 04/16] tools headers UAPI: Update tools's copy of linux/perf_event.h Kan Liang
2020-08-10 21:24 ` [PATCH V6 05/16] perf record: Support new sample type for data page size Kan Liang
2020-08-10 21:24 ` [PATCH V6 06/16] perf script: Use ULL for enum perf_output_field Kan Liang
2020-08-12 12:21 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-08-12 13:42 ` Liang, Kan
2020-08-10 21:24 ` [PATCH V6 07/16] perf script: Support data page size Kan Liang
2020-08-10 21:24 ` [PATCH V6 08/16] perf sort: Add sort option for " Kan Liang
2020-08-10 21:24 ` [PATCH V6 09/16] perf mem: Factor out a function to generate sort order Kan Liang
2020-08-10 21:24 ` [PATCH V6 10/16] perf mem: Clean up output format Kan Liang
2020-08-10 21:24 ` [PATCH V6 11/16] perf mem: Support data page size Kan Liang
2020-08-10 21:24 ` [PATCH V6 12/16] perf test: Add test case for PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_PAGE_SIZE Kan Liang
2020-08-10 21:24 ` [PATCH V6 13/16] perf tools: Add support for PERF_SAMPLE_CODE_PAGE_SIZE Kan Liang
2020-08-10 21:24 ` [PATCH V6 14/16] perf script: " Kan Liang
2020-08-10 21:24 ` [PATCH V6 15/16] perf report: " Kan Liang
2020-08-10 21:24 ` [PATCH V6 16/16] perf test: Add test case " Kan Liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200810224734.GO3982@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox