From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Ajay Kumar <ajaykumar.rs@samsung.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, will@kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org,
nleeder@codeaurora.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC V2 PATCH] dma-iommu: allow devices to set IOVA range dynamically
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 06:49:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200811054912.GA301@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200810175812.29100-1-ajaykumar.rs@samsung.com>
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 11:28:12PM +0530, Ajay Kumar wrote:
> Currently, there is no other option to change the lower limit of
> IOVA for any device than calling iova_init_domain(), but the
> said function will re-init whole domain and also doesn't track
> the previously allocated IOVA before re-initing the domain.
>
> There are cases where the device might not support continuous
> range of addresses, and can also have dependency among buffers
> allocated for firmware, image manipulation, etc and all of the
> address requests pass through IOMMU. In such cases, we can allocate
> buffers stage by stage by setting address limit, and also keep
> track the of same.
>
> Bit of background can be found here:
> IOVA allocation dependency between firmware buffer and remaining buffers
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/iommu/msg43586.html
>
> This patch allows devices to limit the IOVA space they want
> during allocation at any given point of time. We shall allow
> the same only if the device owns the corresponding iommu_domain,
> that is the device is the only master attached to the domain.
>
> The lower limit of IOVA space is marked by start_pfn, and the upper
> limit is marked by dma_mask and this patch honors the same.
> Since changing dma_mask can extend the addressable region beyond
> current cached node, we do a reset of current cached nodes as well.
>
> User drivers can make call sequence like below:
> ============================================================
> When they want to limit IOVA for allocated buffers in range
> 0x0 to 0x1000000:
> iommu_set_iova_range(dev, 0x0, 0x1000000 - 1);
>
> When they want to limit IOVA for allocated buffers in range
> 0x1000000 to 0xC0000000:
> iommu_set_iova_range(dev, 0x1000000, 0xC0000000 - 0x1000000);
> =============================================================
This still seems to be missing an actual user of the functionality.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-11 5:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20200810182328epcas5p2d5ffb5a5850a641fe7d31aa945c6c835@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2020-08-10 17:58 ` [RFC V2 PATCH] dma-iommu: allow devices to set IOVA range dynamically Ajay Kumar
2020-08-11 5:49 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200811054912.GA301@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=ajaykumar.rs@samsung.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=nleeder@codeaurora.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox