From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Peter Oskolkov <posk@google.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Chris Kennelly <ckennelly@google.com>,
Peter Oskolkov <posk@posk.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v3] rseq/membarrier: add MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_RSEQ
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 08:27:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200811062733.GP3982@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200811000959.2486636-1-posk@google.com>
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 05:09:58PM -0700, Peter Oskolkov wrote:
> @@ -27,6 +35,12 @@
>
> static void ipi_mb(void *info)
> {
The #ifdef wants to behere, otherwise you'll get a compile warning for
!RSEQ builds.
> + int *flags = info;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RSEQ
> + if (flags && (*flags == MEMBARRIER_FLAG_RSEQ))
> + rseq_preempt(current);
> +#endif
> smp_mb(); /* IPIs should be serializing but paranoid. */
> }
But yes, this looks much better.
Mathieu did mention a few other points that I didn't see addressed:
- he didn't like abusing the @flags syscall argument for a CPUid;
- he wondered if we should support SYNC_CORE + RSEQ.
Not sure we can easily change the syscall at this point, but the latter
point could be addressed with something like this.
---
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched/membarrier.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched/membarrier.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched/membarrier.c
@@ -374,8 +374,26 @@ static int membarrier_register_private_e
*/
SYSCALL_DEFINE2(membarrier, int, cmd, int, flags)
{
+ int cflags = 0, int cpuid = -1;
+
if (unlikely(flags) && cmd != MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_RSEQ)
return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (cmd & (MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED |
+ MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_SYNC_CORE |
+ MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_RSEQ)) {
+
+ if (cmd & MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_RSEQ)
+ cflags |= MEMBARRIER_FLAG_RSEQ;
+
+ if (cmd & MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_SYNC_CORE) {
+ cflags |= MEMBARRIER_FLAG_SYNC_CORE;
+ cpuid = flags;
+ }
+
+ cmd = MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED;
+ }
+
switch (cmd) {
case MEMBARRIER_CMD_QUERY:
{
@@ -396,18 +414,16 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(membarrier, int, cmd, in
return membarrier_global_expedited();
case MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_GLOBAL_EXPEDITED:
return membarrier_register_global_expedited();
- case MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED:
- return membarrier_private_expedited(0, -1);
case MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED:
return membarrier_register_private_expedited(0);
- case MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_SYNC_CORE:
- return membarrier_private_expedited(MEMBARRIER_FLAG_SYNC_CORE, -1);
case MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_SYNC_CORE:
return membarrier_register_private_expedited(MEMBARRIER_FLAG_SYNC_CORE);
- case MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_RSEQ:
- return membarrier_private_expedited(MEMBARRIER_FLAG_RSEQ, flags);
case MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_RSEQ:
return membarrier_register_private_expedited(MEMBARRIER_FLAG_RSEQ);
+
+ case MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED:
+ return membarrier_private_expedited(cflags, cpuid);
+
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-11 6:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-11 0:09 [PATCH 1/2 v3] rseq/membarrier: add MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_RSEQ Peter Oskolkov
2020-08-11 0:09 ` [PATCH 2/2 v3] rseq/selftests: test MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_RSEQ Peter Oskolkov
2020-08-12 20:11 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-08-11 6:27 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-08-11 7:54 ` [PATCH 1/2 v3] rseq/membarrier: add MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_RSEQ Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-11 21:08 ` Peter Oskolkov
2020-08-12 18:30 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-08-12 18:48 ` Peter Oskolkov
2020-08-12 19:44 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-08-20 17:42 ` Peter Oskolkov
2020-08-25 16:58 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-08-25 17:22 ` Peter Oskolkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200811062733.GP3982@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=ckennelly@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=posk@google.com \
--cc=posk@posk.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox