From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1542C433E0 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 06:45:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7095206C3 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 06:45:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=mg.codeaurora.org header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.b="aq+bhGjt" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728193AbgHKGpv (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Aug 2020 02:45:51 -0400 Received: from mail29.static.mailgun.info ([104.130.122.29]:64139 "EHLO mail29.static.mailgun.info" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727066AbgHKGpu (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Aug 2020 02:45:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1597128350; h=In-Reply-To: Content-Type: MIME-Version: References: Message-ID: Subject: Cc: To: From: Date: Sender; bh=qaD0uP3479tOBE0W+RFgHcukoSHpOeQAxStJYz/hn1I=; b=aq+bhGjtjGejAvXAcU4cnU5FhoASzZ8mT4YgtFaSSrj28cdToFou2ehxK13S+Lokamt+v20s 1LcKSxsaydytHRUtxla8pEm7QTG5/q63Qr9xS507pwHKmva0HuWzB9RdwdhnSUYwbVa1RjYU XM038BUgaYQ4tdZLC9yw8MOxo+o= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 104.130.122.29 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI0MWYwYSIsICJsaW51eC1rZXJuZWxAdmdlci5rZXJuZWwub3JnIiwgImJlOWU0YSJd Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n03.prod.us-west-2.postgun.com with SMTP id 5f323e973f2ce110203c104b (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Tue, 11 Aug 2020 06:45:43 GMT Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1C890C433CB; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 06:45:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from codeaurora.org (unknown [180.166.53.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tingwei) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7AB43C433C6; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 06:45:40 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 7AB43C433C6 Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=tingweiz@codeaurora.org Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:45:29 +0800 From: Tingwei Zhang To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Mathieu Poirier , Suzuki K Poulose , Tingwei Zhang , Ingo Molnar , tsoni@codeaurora.org, Sai Prakash Ranjan , Mao Jinlong , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] tracing: export event trace and trace_marker Message-ID: <20200811064529.GA4253@codeaurora.org> References: <20200728013359.2326-1-tingwei@codeaurora.org> <20200811030418.GA1893@codeaurora.org> <20200810231954.3388855c@oasis.local.home> <20200811034946.GA9338@codeaurora.org> <20200811000333.5d24b16f@oasis.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200811000333.5d24b16f@oasis.local.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 12:03:33PM +0800, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:49:46 +0800 > Tingwei Zhang wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:19:54AM +0800, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:04:18 +0800 > > > Tingwei Zhang wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks for your comments, Steven. I've addressed all your comments > in > > > v3. > > > > Do you have more comments on v3? Is there anything I need to do to > merge > > > > this series to Linux Kernel? > > > > > > I gave my Reviewed-by tag on each of the patches that touch my tree. > It > > > should go in via whoever maintains the drivers/hwtracing tree. Is that > > > Greg KH? > > I thought it will go to tracing tree since majority of the changes are > in > > kernel/trace. > > > > Maintainers of drviers/hwtracing are Mathieu and Suzuki. I'll add them > > into review list. > > > > As I didn't have reviews or acks from them. I couldn't take the code. > When touching two subsystems, it usually requires one of the subsystem > maintainers to ack the changes to their subsystem, so that the other > subsystem maintainer can take the rest of the code through their tree. > > And it usually goes through the tree that has the interface that is > changing. That is, the changes to tracing was the infrastructure > needed for the changes in the hwtrace subsystem. And I don't test that > subsystem, so I wouldn't really be able to test this code. > Thanks a lot for detail clarification, Steven. Thanks, Tingwei > -- Steve