From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: POC: Alternative solution: Re: [PATCH 0/4] printk: reimplement LOG_CONT handling
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 09:51:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200813075117.GJ12903@alley> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200813051853.GA510@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
On Thu 2020-08-13 14:18:53, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (20/08/13 02:30), John Ogness wrote:
> > 2. I haven't yet figured out how to preserve calling context when a
> > newline appears. For example:
> >
> > pr_info("text");
> > pr_cont(" 1");
> > pr_cont(" 2\n");
> > pr_cont("3");
> > pr_cont(" 4\n");
> >
> > For "3" the calling context (info, timestamp) is lost because with "2"
> > the record is finalized. Perhaps the above is invalid usage of LOG_CONT?
If I get it correctly, the original code has the same problem.
The cont buffer is flushed when the cont piece ends with newline:
static bool cont_add(u32 caller_id, int facility, int level,
enum log_flags flags, const char *text, size_t len)
{
[...]
// The original flags come from the first line,
// but later continuations can add a newline.
if (flags & LOG_NEWLINE) {
cont.flags |= LOG_NEWLINE;
cont_flush();
}
return true;
}
cont_flush sets cont.len = 0;
static void cont_flush(void)
{
[...]
cont.len = 0;
}
The messages is appended only when cont.len != 0 in log_output:
static size_t log_output(int facility, int level, enum log_flags lflags, const char *dict, size_t dictlen, char *text, size_t text_len)
{
const u32 caller_id = printk_caller_id();
/*
* If an earlier line was buffered, and we're a continuation
* write from the same context, try to add it to the buffer.
*/
if (cont.len) {
if (cont.caller_id == caller_id && (lflags & LOG_CONT)) {
if (cont_add(caller_id, facility, level, lflags, text, text_len))
return text_len;
}
[...]
}
Also the original context is overridden when the cont buffer is empty:
static bool cont_add(u32 caller_id, int facility, int level,
enum log_flags flags, const char *text, size_t len)
{
[...]
if (!cont.len) {
cont.facility = facility;
cont.level = level;
cont.caller_id = caller_id;
cont.ts_nsec = local_clock();
cont.flags = flags;
}
[...]
}
So I would ignore this problem for now.
> This is not an unseen pattern, I'm afraid. And the problem here can
> be more general:
>
> pr_info("text");
> pr_cont("1");
> exception/IRQ/NMI
> pr_alert("text\n");
> pr_cont("2");
> pr_cont("\n");
>
Good point.
> I guess the solution would be to store "last log_level" in task_struct
> and get current (new) timestamp for broken cont line?
I think about storing the context in per-CPU and per-context array.
It should be more memory efficient than task_struct and it should
solve even the above problem.
> We have this problem now. E.g. early boot messages from one of my boxes:
>
> 6,173,41837,-;x86: Booting SMP configuration:
> 6,174,41838,-;.... node #0, CPUs: #1 #2 #3 #4
> 4,175,44993,-;MDS CPU bug present and SMT on, data leak possible. See https://www.kernel.org/doc/...
> 4,176,44993,c; #5 #6 #7
>
> "CPUs: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7" is supposed to be one cont line with
> loglevel 6. But it gets interrupted and flushed so that "#5 #6 #7"
> appears with the different loglevel.
Nice example. It would be nice to fix this. But it should be done
separately.
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-13 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-17 23:48 [PATCH 0/4] printk: reimplement LOG_CONT handling John Ogness
2020-07-17 23:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] printk: ringbuffer: support dataless records John Ogness
2020-07-20 14:49 ` John Ogness
2020-07-17 23:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] printk: store instead of processing cont parts John Ogness
2020-07-19 14:35 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-07-19 18:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-07-20 1:50 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-07-20 18:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-07-21 3:53 ` Joe Perches
2020-07-21 14:42 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-07-21 14:57 ` John Ogness
2020-07-29 2:03 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-07-21 15:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-07-28 2:22 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-07-17 23:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] printk: process cont records during reading John Ogness
2020-07-17 23:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] ipconfig: cleanup printk usage John Ogness
2020-07-18 0:00 ` [PATCH 0/4] printk: reimplement LOG_CONT handling Linus Torvalds
2020-07-18 14:42 ` John Ogness
2020-07-18 17:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-08-11 16:05 ` Petr Mladek
2020-08-12 16:39 ` POC: Alternative solution: " Petr Mladek
2020-08-13 0:24 ` John Ogness
2020-08-13 5:18 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-08-13 7:44 ` John Ogness
2020-08-13 8:41 ` Petr Mladek
2020-08-13 10:29 ` John Ogness
2020-08-13 11:30 ` Petr Mladek
2020-08-14 3:34 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-08-14 8:16 ` John Ogness
2020-08-14 9:12 ` Petr Mladek
2020-08-13 11:54 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-08-14 9:04 ` Petr Mladek
2020-08-14 22:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-08-14 23:52 ` Joe Perches
2020-08-15 2:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-08-15 3:08 ` Joe Perches
2020-08-15 9:25 ` David Laight
2020-08-15 5:41 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-08-13 7:51 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2020-08-13 7:31 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200813075117.GJ12903@alley \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox