From: peterz@infradead.org
To: Uriel Guajardo <urielguajardojr@gmail.com>
Cc: brendanhiggins@google.com, mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, urielguajardo@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kunit: added lockdep support
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:36:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200813103615.GT2674@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200812193332.954395-1-urielguajardojr@gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 07:33:32PM +0000, Uriel Guajardo wrote:
> KUnit will fail tests upon observing a lockdep failure. Because lockdep
> turns itself off after its first failure, only fail the first test and
> warn users to not expect any future failures from lockdep.
>
> Similar to lib/locking-selftest [1], we check if the status of
> debug_locks has changed after the execution of a test case. However, we
> do not reset lockdep afterwards.
>
> Like the locking selftests, we also fix possible preemption count
> corruption from lock bugs.
> +static void kunit_check_locking_bugs(struct kunit *test,
> + unsigned long saved_preempt_count,
> + bool saved_debug_locks)
> +{
> + preempt_count_set(saved_preempt_count);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
> + if (softirq_count())
> + current->softirqs_enabled = 0;
> + else
> + current->softirqs_enabled = 1;
> +#endif
Urgh, don't silently change these... if they're off that's a hard fail.
if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(preempt_count() != saved_preempt_count))
preempt_count_set(saved_preempt_count);
And by using DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON() it will kill IRQ tracing and trigger
the below fail.
> + if (saved_debug_locks && !debug_locks) {
> + kunit_set_failure(test);
> + kunit_warn(test, "Dynamic analysis tool failure from LOCKDEP.");
> + kunit_warn(test, "Further tests will have LOCKDEP disabled.");
> + }
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-13 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-12 19:33 [PATCH v2] kunit: added lockdep support Uriel Guajardo
2020-08-13 9:11 ` Alan Maguire
2020-08-13 16:44 ` Uriel Guajardo
2020-08-13 10:36 ` peterz [this message]
2020-08-13 13:15 ` Uriel Guajardo
2020-08-13 18:35 ` peterz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200813103615.GT2674@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=urielguajardo@google.com \
--cc=urielguajardojr@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox