From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B530DC433DF for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 10:12:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C03020789 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 10:12:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="pHATl2sz" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726784AbgHRKMn (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Aug 2020 06:12:43 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:41994 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726590AbgHRKMn (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Aug 2020 06:12:43 -0400 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f26be00329c23fffea6a903.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f26:be00:329c:23ff:fea6:a903]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id B078D1EC0242; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 12:12:41 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1597745561; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=MKT2E1oYlR0YKb4IeiRvZJA7wmTBh6Kl+He4UCrOyQY=; b=pHATl2szjiox7Cgv8z9qTteNJqRiEaOOQzlNxBF/mz+oZlfXS0MtSxpAm8hArxz/uXj0cB Qu7nPMN3L2i4GuA3FKn/WITvX2HyHkH2TByOQFZI3sXZAtCl+QYPrTFw+9r6mPxzh7MOVY MrqIcJc90y8i0fN+ka74iIoMepOfuVI= Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 12:13:34 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Yazen Ghannam Cc: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/MCE/AMD, EDAC/mce_amd: Remove struct smca_hwid.xec_bitmap Message-ID: <20200818101334.GA31641@zn.tnic> References: <20200720145353.43924-1-Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com> <20200817093956.GC549@zn.tnic> <20200817151821.GA1095089@yaz-nikka.amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200817151821.GA1095089@yaz-nikka.amd.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 10:18:21AM -0500, Yazen Ghannam wrote: > Yeah, I'm trying to keep "may" out of my vocabulary. :) Hahha, you never know with hardware :-) > I do. This check was added because I wasn't sure what to expect with > this new architecural extension. But after a few product releases, it > has been unnecessary. And I don't see a need for it with future systems. Ok, will add that to the commit message. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette