Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] extcon: extcon-ptn5150: Add the USB external connector support

Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX
2020-08-26T09:44:09Z

Hi Andy,

On 26/8/2020 5:18 pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 10:51:37AM +0800, Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX wrote:
>> On 25/8/2020 4:19 pm, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 04:45:38PM +0800, Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX wrote:
>>>> On 19/8/2020 3:55 pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 8:38 AM Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX
>>>>> <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 18/8/2020 4:40 pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 02:57:18PM +0800, Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX wrote:
>>>>>>>> USB external connector chip PTN5150 used on the Intel LGM SoC
>>>>>>>> boards to detect the USB type and connection.
>>>>>>> Internally I meant you can send cleanups, but couple of patches here are the
>>>>>>> features and were still under discussion... But here we are.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you mean asking us to implement the Heikki suggested as below..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Heikki Krogerus: register the port and the partner attached to it with
>>>>>> the USB Type-C connector class in the driver. Is my understaanding
>>>>>> right? if not, please explain it. Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> When you mention somebody, don't forget to Cc them (now done by me).
>>>> Sure, Thank you
>>>
>>> So the patches 1-5 are fine. The rest needs to be rewritten.
>> Already Krzysztof submitted all the patches and got approved, so we started
>> sending only one patch which support to Intel LGM SoC based boards, Thanks!
>
> I'm not sure what you meant by above.
>
> Krzysztof suggested you to squash all first patches into 1 (or two) and he
> approves it. What you have to do is follow his advise and send v2 where it will
> be one (or two) patch with his tag attached.
Yes, you're right, the above discussion was before Krzysztof reviewed my
patches, sure will follow his advise, thanks!

Regards
Vadivel
>
> Krzysztof, is it correct what I'm saying?
>