Re: [PATCH v1 2/9] extcon: extcon-ptn5150: Switch to GENMASK() for VBUS detection macro

Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX
2020-08-26T07:34:07Z

Hi,

On 26/8/2020 2:59 pm, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 02:57:20PM +0800, Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX wrote:
>> From: Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> Switch to GENMASK() for VBUS detection macro.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/extcon/extcon-ptn5150.c | 9 +++------
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> This is too simple change, should be squashed with 1, 3, 4 and 5.
>
> There is no point to split each change a define to use BIT or GENMASK.
Thank you for the review comments and suggestions.
Sure, I will squash it as mentioned patches mentioned above.

Best Regards
Vadivel
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-ptn5150.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-ptn5150.c
>> index 5d9a8767646b..c816a6c1e05c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-ptn5150.c
>> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-ptn5150.c
>> @@ -42,9 +42,7 @@ enum ptn5150_reg {
>> #define PTN5150_REG_CC_PORT_ATTACHMENT_MASK \
>> (0x7 << PTN5150_REG_CC_PORT_ATTACHMENT_SHIFT)
>>
>> -#define PTN5150_REG_CC_VBUS_DETECTION_SHIFT 7
>> -#define PTN5150_REG_CC_VBUS_DETECTION_MASK \
>> - (0x1 << PTN5150_REG_CC_VBUS_DETECTION_SHIFT)
>> +#define PTN5150_REG_CC_VBUS_DETECTION BIT(7)
>>
>> #define PTN5150_REG_INT_CABLE_ATTACH_SHIFT 0
>> #define PTN5150_REG_INT_CABLE_ATTACH_MASK \
>> @@ -130,9 +128,8 @@ static void ptn5150_irq_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> case PTN5150_UFP_ATTACHED:
>> extcon_set_state_sync(info->edev, EXTCON_USB,
>> false);
>> - vbus = ((reg_data &
>> - PTN5150_REG_CC_VBUS_DETECTION_MASK) >>
>> - PTN5150_REG_CC_VBUS_DETECTION_SHIFT);
>> + vbus = FIELD_GET(PTN5150_REG_CC_VBUS_DETECTION,
>> + reg_data);
>> if (vbus)
>> gpiod_set_value(info->vbus_gpiod, 0);
>> else
>> --
>> 2.11.0
>>