From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3232C433E1 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 13:32:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F4A221E2 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 13:32:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1598448740; bh=N7hZxylonpulq+kvN5bIqiP/e2mXO2Jt1hFduoiS2vk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=FQjJxBGKTFmHlcL2KqSRLY5FDdantnMO9rTorKE7F6ZqrquiOJtLa7mW+4SsWoSRH puHfGSPX+85nIGJrkmzDn7W7zlqoEMpFod0gEcHNytFZ4voUoGJDD2tPCfKJHdc3sX GHhzmKFsRA4o5KPivOBTeAJPwITFSGSlAXIk7GX8= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730320AbgHZNcC (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Aug 2020 09:32:02 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45786 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730288AbgHZNb5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Aug 2020 09:31:57 -0400 Received: from coco.lan (ip5f5ad5c5.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [95.90.213.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97A0621741; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 13:31:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1598448716; bh=N7hZxylonpulq+kvN5bIqiP/e2mXO2Jt1hFduoiS2vk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HHHbW4O+lFudLOGG8w10yrHscW841Md6gaw0W5oaXoZM0peA8oJAYZJza+fpfjTek I8e+fqSVTuGp3U9k4VGGuUeYAwzpaVI0jkaJwC4DQb+5m3+jra3hoNLkYd+ElQ8Dbm b4xlH4UAyzGHgp7yjTOR593NTzAvN7l44aXcTst4= Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 15:31:52 +0200 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Linux Doc Mailing List , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Frank A. Cancio Bello" , "Joel Fernandes (Google)" , "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" , Thomas Gleixner , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: trace: ring-buffer-design.rst: use the new SPDX tag Message-ID: <20200826153152.54ce996a@coco.lan> In-Reply-To: <20200826064733.33c22a2c@lwn.net> References: <290d101bee434e54acec13778c67c77802fbc953.1598426895.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> <20200826064733.33c22a2c@lwn.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.6 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Wed, 26 Aug 2020 06:47:33 -0600 Jonathan Corbet escreveu: > On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 09:28:24 +0200 > Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > SPDX v3.10 gained support for GFDL-1.2 with no invariant sections: > > > > https://spdx.org/licenses/GFDL-1.2-invariants-only.html > > > > Let's use it, instead of keeping a license text for this file. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab > > --- > > Documentation/trace/ring-buffer-design.rst | 26 +--------------------- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 25 deletions(-) > > [CC expanded] > > If we're going to do this, I think we should also add GFDL to the right > place in the LICENSES directory - deprecated/ or at best dual/. But even > SPDX (https://spdx.org/licenses/GFDL-1.2.html) says this license is > deprecated. Right. I'll send a separate patch adding it to deprecated/ together with GFDL-1.1-no-invariants-or-later, which is used at the media uAPI documentation. There, GFDL 1.1 is used both together with GPL (dual licensed is required for new files) and alone (for the legacy document files). > > Beyond that, https://spdx.org/licenses/GFDL-1.2-invariants-only.html seems > to disagree with your interpretation; it seems you would want > GFDL-1.2-only-no-invariants ? Thanks for reviewing! Yeah, indeed I mangled this one. It should be, instead: GFDL-1.2-no-invariants-only https://spdx.org/licenses/GFDL-1.2-no-invariants-only.html I'll send a second version fix it. Thanks, Mauro