public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Cc: acme@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	namhyung@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	eranian@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] TopDown metrics support for Ice Lake (perf tool)
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 17:54:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200826155441.GA783610@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200820164532.8011-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 09:45:28AM -0700, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> 
> The kernel patches have been merged into the tip's perf/core branch.
> The patch set is on top of commit 2cb5383b30d4 ("perf/x86/intel: Support
> per-thread RDPMC TopDown metrics") of the tip's perf/core branch.
> 
> The changes for the perf tool include:
> - Extend --topdown option to support per thread TopDown metrics
> - Support sample-read topdown metric group
> - Add a complete document for the TopDown usage.
> 
> Ice Lake has support for measuring the level 1 TopDown metrics
> directly in hardware. This is implemented by an additional METRICS
> register, and a new Fixed Counter 3 that measures pipeline SLOTS.
> 
> New in Icelake
> - Do not require generic counters. This allows to collect TopDown always
>   in addition to other events.
> - Measuring TopDown per thread/process instead of only per core
> 
> For the Ice Lake implementation of performance metrics, the values in
> PERF_METRICS MSR are derived from fixed counter 3. Software should start
> both registers, PERF_METRICS and fixed counter 3, from zero.
> Additionally, software is recommended to periodically clear both
> registers in order to maintain accurate measurements. The latter is
> required for certain scenarios that involve sampling metrics at high
> rates. Software should always write fixed counter 3 before write to
> PERF_METRICS.
> 
> IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS. OVF_PERF_METRICS[48]: If this bit is set,
> it indicates that some PERF_METRICS-related counter has overflowed and
> a PMI is triggered. Software has to synchronize, e.g. re-start,
> PERF_METRICS as well as fixed counter 3. Otherwise, PERF_METRICS may
> return invalid values.
> 
> Limitation
> - To get accurate result and avoid reading the METRICS register multiple
>   times, the TopDown metrics events and SLOTS event have to be in the
>   same group.
> - METRICS and SLOTS registers have to be cleared after each read by SW.
>   That is to prevent the lose of precision.
> - Cannot do sampling read SLOTS and TopDown metric events
> 
> Please refer SDM Vol3, 18.3.9.3 Performance Metrics for the details of
> TopDown metrics.
> 
> Andi Kleen (2):
>   perf stat: Support new per thread TopDown metrics
>   perf, tools: Add documentation for topdown metrics
> 
> Kan Liang (2):
>   perf tools: Rename group to topdown
>   perf record: Support sample-read topdown metric group

I don't have Ice lake to actualy check, but it looks good

Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>

thanks,
jirka


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-26 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-20 16:45 [PATCH 0/4] TopDown metrics support for Ice Lake (perf tool) kan.liang
2020-08-20 16:45 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf tools: Rename group to topdown kan.liang
2020-08-20 16:45 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf record: Support sample-read topdown metric group kan.liang
2020-08-20 16:45 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf stat: Support new per thread TopDown metrics kan.liang
2020-08-20 20:05   ` Andi Kleen
2020-08-20 16:45 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf, tools: Add documentation for topdown metrics kan.liang
2020-08-26 15:54 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2020-08-27 12:39   ` [PATCH 0/4] TopDown metrics support for Ice Lake (perf tool) Liang, Kan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200826155441.GA783610@krava \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox