public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
	npiggin@gmail.com, elver@google.com, jgross@suse.com,
	paulmck@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
	svens@linux.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] lockdep: Use raw_cpu_*() for per-cpu variables
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 21:05:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200827010543.GA1939707@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200821085348.192346882@infradead.org>

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 10:47:39AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Sven reported that commit a21ee6055c30 ("lockdep: Change
> hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables") caused trouble on
> s390 because their this_cpu_*() primitives disable preemption which
> then lands back tracing.
> 
> On the one hand, per-cpu ops should use preempt_*able_notrace() and
> raw_local_irq_*(), on the other hand, we can trivialy use raw_cpu_*()
> ops for this.
> 
> Fixes: a21ee6055c30 ("lockdep: Change hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables")
> Reported-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>

Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>

thanks,

 - Joel

> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/irqflags.h |    6 +++---
>  include/linux/lockdep.h  |   18 +++++++++++++-----
>  kernel/locking/lockdep.c |    4 ++--
>  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/include/linux/irqflags.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqflags.h
> @@ -53,13 +53,13 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, hardirq_context);
>    extern void trace_hardirqs_off_finish(void);
>    extern void trace_hardirqs_on(void);
>    extern void trace_hardirqs_off(void);
> -# define lockdep_hardirq_context()	(this_cpu_read(hardirq_context))
> +# define lockdep_hardirq_context()	(raw_cpu_read(hardirq_context))
>  # define lockdep_softirq_context(p)	((p)->softirq_context)
>  # define lockdep_hardirqs_enabled()	(this_cpu_read(hardirqs_enabled))
>  # define lockdep_softirqs_enabled(p)	((p)->softirqs_enabled)
>  # define lockdep_hardirq_enter()			\
>  do {							\
> -	if (this_cpu_inc_return(hardirq_context) == 1)	\
> +	if (__this_cpu_inc_return(hardirq_context) == 1)\
>  		current->hardirq_threaded = 0;		\
>  } while (0)
>  # define lockdep_hardirq_threaded()		\
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ do {						\
>  } while (0)
>  # define lockdep_hardirq_exit()			\
>  do {						\
> -	this_cpu_dec(hardirq_context);		\
> +	__this_cpu_dec(hardirq_context);	\
>  } while (0)
>  # define lockdep_softirq_enter()		\
>  do {						\
> --- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
> @@ -535,19 +535,27 @@ do {									\
>  DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, hardirqs_enabled);
>  DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, hardirq_context);
>  
> +/*
> + * The below lockdep_assert_*() macros use raw_cpu_read() to access the above
> + * per-cpu variables. This is required because this_cpu_read() will potentially
> + * call into preempt/irq-disable and that obviously isn't right. This is also
> + * correct because when IRQs are enabled, it doesn't matter if we accidentally
> + * read the value from our previous CPU.
> + */
> +
>  #define lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled()					\
>  do {									\
> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(debug_locks && !this_cpu_read(hardirqs_enabled));	\
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(debug_locks && !raw_cpu_read(hardirqs_enabled));	\
>  } while (0)
>  
>  #define lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled()					\
>  do {									\
> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(debug_locks && this_cpu_read(hardirqs_enabled));	\
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(debug_locks && raw_cpu_read(hardirqs_enabled));	\
>  } while (0)
>  
>  #define lockdep_assert_in_irq()						\
>  do {									\
> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(debug_locks && !this_cpu_read(hardirq_context));	\
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(debug_locks && !raw_cpu_read(hardirq_context));	\
>  } while (0)
>  
>  #define lockdep_assert_preemption_enabled()				\
> @@ -555,7 +563,7 @@ do {									\
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT)	&&		\
>  		     debug_locks			&&		\
>  		     (preempt_count() != 0		||		\
> -		      !this_cpu_read(hardirqs_enabled)));		\
> +		      !raw_cpu_read(hardirqs_enabled)));		\
>  } while (0)
>  
>  #define lockdep_assert_preemption_disabled()				\
> @@ -563,7 +571,7 @@ do {									\
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT)	&&		\
>  		     debug_locks			&&		\
>  		     (preempt_count() == 0		&&		\
> -		      this_cpu_read(hardirqs_enabled)));		\
> +		      raw_cpu_read(hardirqs_enabled)));			\
>  } while (0)
>  
>  #else
> --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> @@ -3756,7 +3756,7 @@ void noinstr lockdep_hardirqs_on(unsigne
>  
>  skip_checks:
>  	/* we'll do an OFF -> ON transition: */
> -	this_cpu_write(hardirqs_enabled, 1);
> +	__this_cpu_write(hardirqs_enabled, 1);
>  	trace->hardirq_enable_ip = ip;
>  	trace->hardirq_enable_event = ++trace->irq_events;
>  	debug_atomic_inc(hardirqs_on_events);
> @@ -3795,7 +3795,7 @@ void noinstr lockdep_hardirqs_off(unsign
>  		/*
>  		 * We have done an ON -> OFF transition:
>  		 */
> -		this_cpu_write(hardirqs_enabled, 0);
> +		__this_cpu_write(hardirqs_enabled, 0);
>  		trace->hardirq_disable_ip = ip;
>  		trace->hardirq_disable_event = ++trace->irq_events;
>  		debug_atomic_inc(hardirqs_off_events);
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-27  1:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-21  8:47 [PATCH v2 00/11] TRACE_IRQFLAGS wreckage Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-21  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] lockdep: Use raw_cpu_*() for per-cpu variables Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-27  1:05   ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2020-08-27  7:54   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-21  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] cpuidle: Fixup IRQ state Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-21 17:36   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-08-27  1:06     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-08-27  7:54   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-21  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] sched,idle,rcu: Push rcu_idle deeper into the idle path Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-27  1:18   ` Joel Fernandes
2020-08-27  1:24     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-08-27  7:47       ` peterz
2020-08-27  7:53         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-08-27 22:30         ` Joel Fernandes
2020-09-02  7:08           ` peterz
2020-08-27  7:54   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-21  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] cpuidle: Make CPUIDLE_FLAG_TLB_FLUSHED generic Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-27  7:54   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-21  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] cpuidle: Move trace_cpu_idle() into generic code Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-27  7:54   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-21  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] x86/entry: Remove unused THUNKs Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-27  7:54   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-21  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] locking/lockdep: Cleanup Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-27  7:54   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-21  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] nds32: Implement arch_irqs_disabled() Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-27  7:54   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-21  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] arm64: " Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-27  7:54   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-21  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] lockdep: Only trace IRQ edges Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-26  0:47   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-02  4:21   ` Guenter Roeck
2020-09-02  9:09     ` peterz
2020-09-02  9:12       ` peterz
2020-09-02 13:48         ` Guenter Roeck
2020-09-08 14:22           ` peterz
2020-09-08 14:40             ` Guenter Roeck
2020-09-08 15:41               ` [PATCH] sparc64: Fix irqtrace warnings on Ultra-S peterz
2020-08-21  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] lockdep,trace: Expose tracepoints Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-27  7:54   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-09-02  3:51   ` [PATCH v2 11/11] " Guenter Roeck
2020-09-02  7:24     ` peterz
2020-09-02 13:21       ` Guenter Roeck
2020-09-02  8:56     ` peterz
2020-09-02 13:57       ` Guenter Roeck
2020-09-03 14:00         ` peterz
2020-09-03 14:13           ` peterz
2020-09-03 15:19           ` Guenter Roeck
2020-09-03 15:36             ` peterz
2020-09-03 15:54               ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-03 18:11               ` Guenter Roeck
2020-08-21 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] TRACE_IRQFLAGS wreckage peterz
2020-08-26 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 12/11] mips: Implement arch_irqs_disabled() peterz
2020-08-27  7:54   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200827010543.GA1939707@google.com \
    --to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox